一、SURVEY OF THE CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES——Ⅲ. ACTIVITIES IN EXTERNAL GEOSCIENTIFIC EXCHANGES（论文文献综述）
Ahsan Nawaz[1]（2021）在《获取真实领导力与组织学习和创新对CPEC项目管理成功的中介效应》文中研究指明本研究基于巴基斯坦CPEC项目,探讨组织创新与组织学习在真实领导行为之间的中介作用。中巴经济走廊（CPEC）是中国和巴基斯坦政府联合发起并管理的宏大工程,包括基础设施、电力和社会发展等多个项目。本研究以真实领导与组织创新和组织学习变量正相关为基础,旨在探讨组织创新和组织学习如何影响项目成功中的真实领导。本文采用演绎法对假设进行检验,以问卷调查为主要数据收集工具。在数据收集过程中应用了定量和定性技术。本项研究采用横截面的时间范围进行研究,具有解释性和探索性特点。从典型的定量研究框架出发,归纳分析与CPEC项目相关的文献,包括学术论文和相关文件。研究对象包括直接或间接为CPEC项目工作的跨国公司和政府有关组织机构。公司管理者、领导者和项目领导者共同构成本研究样本源,以目的取样为技术手段获取样本,所用研究工具为预先开发好的。本研究从与CPEC项目有关的私营公司或政府相关部门的高中层管理人员中,发放了总共295份调查问卷,以之为基础进行数据整理和分析。研究者采用李克特五点量度测量,被调查者可从选项1（强烈不同意）到选项5（强烈同意）中进行选择,以记录受访者对问题的同意程度。问卷最初用英语编制,然后转换成受访者的语言。研究者选取了中国石油工程建设有限责任公司的59个项目,每个项目选取5个具有权威者填写调查问卷,其中有20份是由CPEC高管填写的。在295份问卷中,有35份因不完整而被归类于废卷,260份有效问卷被进一步分析用于具体的研究中。采用SPSS和AMOS-21统计软件对包变量间的相关性进行分析。最终发现有数据表明,真实领导对组织学习和创新的有效影响是主变量。创新是创造力和学习的结晶,是组织成功的关键因素。真正的领导在于指明方向,并通过利用各种管理策略来促进创新、支持创新并变革凝聚力过程。组织学习是组织内部的行动,有意且非自主性地推动组织的积极变化。在巴基斯坦,本研究一个创新性的学术研究项目,并对世界性此类研究文献增添了新内容。
Sheng-qing Xiong[2]（2021）在《Research achievements of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on 60 years of aeromagnetic surveys》文中进行了进一步梳理The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau（also referred to as the Plateau） has long received much attention from the community of geoscience due to its unique geographical location and rich mineral resources. This paper reviews the aeromagnetic surveys in the Plateau in the past 60 years and summarizes relevant research achievements, which mainly include the followings.（1） The boundaries between the Plateau and its surrounding regions have been clarified. In detail, its western boundary is restricted by West Kunlun-Altyn Tagh arc-shaped magnetic anomaly zone forming due to the arc-shaped connection of the Altyn Tagh and Kangxiwa faults and its eastern boundary consists of the boundaries among different magnetic fields along the Longnan（Wudu）-Kangding Fault. Meanwhile, the fault on the northern margin of the Northern Qilian Mountains serves as its northern boundary.（2） The Plateau is mainly composed of four orogens that were stitched together, namely East Kunlun-Qilian, Hoh-Xil-Songpan, Chamdo-Southwestern Sanjiang（Nujiang, Lancang, and Jinsha rivers in southeastern China）, and Gangdese-Himalaya orogens.（3） The basement of the Plateau is dominated by weakly magnetic Proterozoic metamorphic rocks and lacks strongly magnetic Archean crystalline basement of stable continents such as the Tarim and Sichuan blocks. Therefore, it exhibits the characteristics of unstable orogenic basement.（4） The Yarlung-Zangbo suture zone forming due to continent-continent collisions since the Cenozoic shows double aeromagnetic anomaly zones. Therefore, it can be inferred that the Yarlung-Zangbo suture zone formed from the Indian Plate subducting towards and colliding with the Eurasian Plate twice.（5） A huge negative aeromagnetic anomaly in nearly SN trending has been discovered in the middle part of the Plateau, indicating a giant deep thermal-tectonic zone.（6） A dual-layer magnetic structure has been revealed in the Plateau. It consists of shallow magnetic anomaly zones in nearly EW and NW trending and deep magnetic anomaly zones in nearly SN trending. They overlap vertically and cross horizontally, showing the flyover-type geological structure of the Plateau.（7） A group of NW-trending faults occur in eastern Tibet, which is intersected rather than connected by the nearly EW trending that develop in middle-west Tibet.（8） As for the central uplift zone that occurs through the Qiangtang Basin, its metamorphic basement tends to gradually descend from west to east, showing the form of steps. The Qiangtang Basin is divided into the northern and southern part by the central uplift zone in it. The basement in the Qiangtang Basin is deep in the north and west and shallow in the south and west. The basement in the northern Qiangtang Basin is deep and relatively stable and thus is more favorable for the generation and preservation of oil and gas. Up to now, 19 favorable tectonic regions of oil and gas have been determined in the Qiangtang Basin.（9） A total of 21 prospecting areas of mineral resources have been delineated and thousands of ore-bearing（or mineralization） anomalies have been discovered. Additionally, the formation and uplift mechanism of the Plateau are briefly discussed in this paper.
吴玉诗,王海建,车海龙,赵虹旭,马录录,李爱民,刘臣臣,孙冬雪,马铭,李东宇[3]（2020）在《吉林省浑江市幅1∶50000水系沉积物测量原始数据集》文中研究指明吉林省浑江市幅1∶50 000水系沉积物测量共采集1961件水系沉积物样品,采样粒级为–10目～+80目,平均采样密度为5.1个/km2。采用发射光谱法（AES）、泡沫塑料吸附石墨炉原子吸收分光光谱法（GFAAS）、原子荧光法（AFS）及等离子体质谱法（ICP–MS）分析了Au、Ag、Cu、Pb、Zn、As、Sb、Bi、Hg、W、Sn、Mo、Cd、Co、Cr、Ni等16种元素,形成吉林省1∶50 000浑江市幅水系沉积物测量原始数据集。数据集包含有1961件样品以及其16元素的原始数据表1个（Excel）, MapGIS格式图集1套（含有1张矿产地质图、1张采样点位图、16张单元素地球化学图、16张单元素异常图）。通过本数据集新发现单元素地球化学异常403处,综合异常24处,结合地质、物探、化探、遥感及已有成矿线索圈定金矿找矿靶区3处、铜及多金属找矿靶区2处。本文数据集为该区域提供了一套基础性的数据资源,为基础地质及其他领域应用提供基础地球化学依据。
YANG Jin-song,LIU Zhe,WANG Xiang-dong,ZHAO Hua,SONG lei,LIU Tai-bei,WANG Cheng-min,ZHANG Peng[4]（2020）在《Features and values of geological heritage resources in Shunping County, Hebei Province》文中进行了进一步梳理Hebei Province is rich in geological heritage resources due to its diverse landforms and unique natural conditions. However, detailed investigation and study of the resources are still limited, and a systematic survey conducted on a small scale has not been fully implemented. In this paper, the resource types and characteristics of the geological heritage in Shunping County are systematically discussed, on the basis of field investigation and scientific evaluation. With reference to the existing criteria for geological heritage resources survey, the heritage values and corresponding levels were assessed by using multi-factor quantitative evaluation approach. The results show that there are 33 geological heritage sites in Shunping County, which fall into 3 categories, 10 classes and 17 subcategories. Among them, 2 heritage sites are above the provincial level, 14 heritage sites are at the provincial level and 17 ones are below the level. These heritage sites are not only natural resources with great tourism potential, but also valuable asset in geological research, human history, ecological conservation, scientific education and some other aspects. It is hence of great significance to conduct the scientific and reasonable appraisal for having a better understanding, good protection and development of the geological heritage resources in Hebei Province.
Hin-yuen Tsang（曾献源）[5]（2020）在《低温热液矿床地质与地球化学研究 ——以中国贵州天柱金矿和尼日利亚Mika铀矿为例》文中研究表明本文以两个低温热液型矿床-即贵州天柱金矿与尼日利亚Mika的铀矿为例,系统研究其区域地质-构造特征,通过元素-同位素地球化学分析测试,确定了其成岩时代及其成矿的物理-化学条件,建立了成矿地质模型,为区域成矿及找矿勘察提供科学依据。贵州天柱造山型金矿的原始沉积物是长英质火成源区,后经造山改造叠加而成。矿石中具有大颗粒金,品位较富,共伴生金属少的特点。矿体定位受区域背斜构造控制。区域地层受后期雪峰造山运动的改造,提供了大量的成矿热液,为区内金的富集成矿提供了物理-化学条件。年代学研究表明地层中的岩石形成于800Ma的新元古代,根据地质-地球化学资料推断,金矿区大地构造环境应该是新元古时期的大陆边缘或俯冲带边缘环境,该时期岩火山作用十分发育,海床布满黑白烟囱,持续的岩浆喷发,在海水中形成富含硅、铁、铁等离子的热水溶液,含金物质经过地质作用,形成预富集,为后期金矿成矿奠定了物质基础。本研究采用地球化学主元素判别函数图图解,判别岩石源区性质及所形成的大地构造环境;通过研究稀土元素与流体包裹体来分析成矿物质来源及成矿物理化学条件;采用LA-ICP-MS锆石测定矿体赋存岩系的成岩年龄。LA-ICP-MS锆石年代学研究,发现下江群清水江组的凝灰质与砂质板岩和含金石英脉中分选的锆石有相似的年龄分布区间,推测含金石英脉内的锆颗粒可能源自周围的凝灰质及砂质板岩,它们的成岩时代大体上可以追溯到新元古代时的长英质火成源区。成矿流体是在加里东期造山运动（雪峰造山事件）时期变质作用条件下的脱挥发性组分下形成。尼日利亚勘探铀矿无异将为该国带来经济效益。本文针对尼日利亚Mika地区勘探铀矿勘察工作,我们先后在现场开挖了九条探槽,采集大批新鲜的样品,在野外开展放射性测量,据此发现并推断两条轴矿矿脉的展布特征:主要的矿脉向西延伸,走向348°,倾角42°;令一条矿脉走向306°,陡倾角。我们在原地发现沥青铀矿,为进一步深入勘探提供了重要线索。在室内从岩相学的分析获得,成矿母岩花岗岩受构造变形影响,晶质铀矿和玉髓在后期充填在花岗岩的构造裂隙中,形成细矿脉状矿化。伽马射线强度显示,原生铀矿品位1.5%,次生铀品位0.1%。原地辐射测试显示Th和K2O为47.3-3654ppm和4.26-6.26%范围。在勘探中,我们发现在西北-东南方向有一个高辐射区,大体为800x35m范围,最高达到1200cpm,背景辐射约30cpm。通常Mika地区的铀矿品位约0.03%-0.12%。铀矿勘探采用4频道伽马谱仪与伽马剂量计测量,据此编制了U矿勘查区放射性异常分布图,同时在实验室采用低本底高纯锗伽马谱仪分析样品的天然核素,发现了高辐射点范围,并圈地定出有利的勘查目标区,为该区的深部铀矿勘查提供了科学依据,我们认为这个地区铀矿潜力巨大,特别是深层的铀矿资源有待进一步探测和开发。
Fernandes Dearlyn Mario[6]（2020）在《氨基酸示踪中印热带河流沉积物和悬浮颗粒物中有机质的保存、组成和转化》文中进行了进一步梳理陆源有机物通过河流从陆地向海洋迁移,是全球生物地球化学循环（碳、氮等元素）的重要组成部分,这些关键元素的输运和转化对局地地貌、人为干扰和全球气候变化极为敏感,因此陆海界面的物质输送转化的相关研究,将有助于认识全球变化背景下关键元素的源汇行为和控制因素分析。此前,相关研究更多关注有机碳相关过程,对有机氮的输送和转化以及控制因素分析相对薄弱,而有机氮更是在营养循环中起着重要作用,对近海初级生产力和生态系统健康有重大支持。陆海界面的有机氮来源、分布和影响因素的研究也将有助于今后预测其对全球营养盐生物地球化学循环的影响和贡献。研究表明,氮的生物地球化学循环受到自然因素和人为因素的影响,自然因素包括自然地貌特征、气候变化引起的降雨变化（极端洪水、气旋、台风及干旱）,以及人为活动（如建造水坝）、土地利用模式的改变（为农业、工业化、城市化而砍伐森林）等,而这些因素和活动对热带地区的影响了解还很有限。热带地区的水生和陆生生态系统正在经历这些全球环境变化（土地利用变化和气候变化）的强烈影响,因此,小型热带河流系统是理想的研究环境,因为它们具有强烈的时空特征和更敏感的响应。氨基酸作为组成蛋白质的基本单元,在陆生及水生生物体中是有机氮最大的储库。开展河口及海洋中氨基酸组分的研究,将有助于揭示有机氮的来源、循环及生物地球化学行为。印度和中国都是拥有庞大人口的发展中国家,正在经历气候变化（风暴和干旱频率增加）和人类活动（土地使用模式的变化、水坝建设、日益增长的城市化和森林砍伐）的影响。迄今为止、对印度和中国热带小河流生物地球化学过程的了解并不多、尤其是河流氨基酸的来源和组成、运输和转化方面的研究很有限。因此,本论文的研究重点是识别印度西海岸热带河流和海南岛热带河流中氨基酸的时空分布和转化特征。利用先进的地球化学技术和同位素（元素和同位素比值及生物标志物）以及其他辅助参数,对印度和中国选定的热带小河系的氨基酸组成、转化和控制其迁移的因素进行了深入的研究。简要地说,本论文的研究目的如下:1.中印典型小河流和河口沉积物和颗粒物中的有机氮组成和转化的信息;2.从时间和空间上确定控制有机氮输送和转化的因素;3.分析地貌学（河流牛轭弯）和降水变化（季节性和台风活动）和人为活动（土地利用变化）对河流有机物组成和成岩作用的影响。为了实现研究目标,分别在季风期、季风前、季风后的季节对印度河的表层水和沉积物进行样品采集、同时在台风过后（2011年8月）以及非台风时期（2012年10月）分别采集南渡河表层水样品。使用先进的地球化学分析技术（元素组成和同位素比率）以及其它辅助参数（粒度、表面积）进行表征,同时测定生物标记物（氨基酸L-和D-对映异构体）、详细研究了印度和中国特定热带小河流体系中有机质的组成、转化及其控制因素。本论文选择了印度Netravati和Narmada河流,采集了其河流及河口区颗粒有机物和表层沉积物,测定了整体性质参数（总体含量,同位素及比表面积等）,以及沉积物中氨基酸组成（包括其对映异构体结构组成）。结果显示:沉积物中氨基酸的对映异构体组成在Netravati河流中有明显的季节性组成变化和不同程度的降解特征,而Narmada River的沉积物的差异则主要体现在空间变化。在两条河流的表层沉积物中,均检出较高浓度的D型氨基酸,显示了其细菌来源的主要贡献,此外,来自人文活动的贡献可能不容忽视。其中D型精氨酸在所有D型氨基酸中含量是最高的,可能是由于细菌的胞外分泌物贡献及沉积物粘土成分的吸附作用而形成的保存效应。在对Netravati河流沉积物中氨基酸时空组成的细致分析中发现,基于氨基酸组成估算的降解指数（DI）在河流牛轭湾处枯水期间明显更负,表明有降解程度高的物质在此处的累积,体现了局部地貌环境在枯水期间其促淤作用使得有机物的成岩作用被增强。相比之下,在西南季风丰水期间,小河流作为快速冲刷通道,其在旱季积累的有机物被冲刷和重新分散。此外,γ-氨基丁酸与有机物载荷比例（OC:SA）呈负相关,酪氨酸与OC:SA比例则呈正相关,进一步说明不同氨基酸在有机物降解过程中的控制效应差异。来自Netravati和Narmada River的沉积物研究结果深化了地貌环境（牛轭/河流蜿蜒）的作用、降雨量变化对在热带河流中的自然氮循环影响的认知。论文选择印度西部Zuari River及河口区悬浮颗粒物（SPM）中氨基酸的来源和归宿展开了研究。不同季节的对比发现,其众多分析参数含量却没有观察到显着差异。但是盐度、颗粒有机碳、同位素比值、谷氨酸、丝氨酸、丙氨酸、酪氨酸、亮氨酸和D型天冬氨酸的空间变异性显着,暗示了源区贡献的潜在差异性。在季风后期间,POC含量比较低且显示来自混合来源的输入特征。同位素成分显示河口地区的样本比河流地区的样品具有相对较正的数值,这表明除了河流浮游生物和陆地C3植物碎屑的贡献外,还有海洋浮游生物的贡献影响。D型氨基酸如D型丙氨酸、D型天冬氨酸、D型谷氨酸、D型丝氨酸和D型精氨酸,及甘氨酸和非蛋白质氨基酸（y-氨基丁酸,GABA）的存在表明细菌来源对该区域有机碳和氮库的贡献显着。在季风季节和季风后季节,河口地区的有机物相对于河流地区来说有更高的生物活性,在季风季节前则观测到降解程度高的有机物成分。使用主成分分析来确定影响有机物的来源和因素表明,可提取5个因子,解释了总方差的84.5%。第一组分占方差的27.1%,表明潮汐的影响占优势;而第二组分则体现了异养细菌的贡献,主要影响氨基酸组成。根据研究结果,论文明确了Zuari River河口最大浑浊度（ETM）对颗粒有机物的来源和分布的控制作用。在中国海南岛南渡河的颗粒有机物的氨基酸其总浓度大约在0.1-1.1毫克每升,其含量和降解参数存在季节差异。结果表明,在2011年8月（台风）活动期间,南渡河颗粒物的降解状况明显增高。此外,从南渡河氨基酸组成、D/（D+L）比例和颗粒有机物含量可以推断,细菌过程极大程度改变了有机物结构。而较高的氨基酸总量的碳产率表明可能是多种来源造成的,包括维管束植物、浮游生物（海洋和河流）生产和土壤淋滤等。而两个季节观测到的部分氨基酸（丝氨酸、甘氨酸、异亮氨酸等）的显着变化,表明其在早期成岩作用中被优先使用。因此,通过这些中印的小河流体系中氨基酸行为分析发现,氨基酸在各个河流表现为不同的时空分布特征,与不同河流系统的地貌结构及流域中物源组成紧密相关,有机氮的生物可利用性取决于河流和河口区的保存和改造能力。这项研究提供了关于不同河流子系统的悬浮颗粒物和沉积环境中的氨基酸组成和转化的基础数据,并细化了季风影响在热带小河流的差异,弥补了中印小河流中有机氮对地貌和气候变化的响应（迁移和改造）的相关认知。
Zhong-hai Wu,Chun-jing Zhou,Xiao-long Huang,Gen-mo Zhao,Cheng-xuan Tan[7]（2020）在《Main active faults and seismic activity along the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on remote sensing geological survey》文中认为The Yangtze River Economic Belt（YREB） spans three terrain steps in China and features diverse topography that is characterized by significant differences in geological structure and presentday crustal deformation. Active faults and seismic activity are important geological factors for the planning and development of the YREB. In this paper, the spatial distribution and activity of 165 active faults that exist along the YREB have been compiled from previous findings, using both remote-sensing data and geological survey results. The crustal stability of seven particularly noteworthy typical active fault zones and their potential effects on the crustal stability of the urban agglomerations are analyzed. The main active fault zones in the western YREB, together with the neighboring regional active faults, make up an arc fault block region comprising primarily of Sichuan-Yunnan and a "Sichuan-Yunnan arc rotational-shear active tectonic system " strong deformation region that features rotation, shear and extensional deformation. The active faults in the central-eastern YREB, with seven NE-NNE and seven NW-NWW active faults（the "7-longitudinal, 7-horizontal " pattern）, macroscopically make up a"chessboard tectonic system" medium-weak deformation region in the geomechanical tectonic system.They are also the main geological constraints for the crustal stability of the YREB.
Suresh Chaudhary[8]（2020）在《尼泊尔山区耕地撂荒的社会与生态环境风险研究》文中指出在尼泊尔和世界许多山区国家,撂荒已成为一种普遍现象。耕地撂荒不仅会给国家和地区带来粮食安全风险,同时在高山地区也会产生生态环境安全风险,危及山区生态系统关键服务的能力。本研究以尼泊尔西北高山区为研究对象,对撂荒引发的生态环境风险及其对控制因素（生物物理,社会经济,气候和社区）的依赖性开展研究,以期实现如下目标:（i）揭示撂荒对尼泊尔高山区社会及生态环境带来的影响;（ii）查明尼泊尔西部高山区撂荒的时空变化、原因及相关的生态环境风险;（iii）研发评估撂荒生态环境风险的指数和方法;（iv）提出可持续利用现有撂荒的相关政策和策略建议。通过对尼泊尔撂荒及其生态环境响应的深入研究,为高山区国家和地区景观管理以及国土可持续利用决策提供理论和技术支持。在收集和分析尼泊尔高山区地理特征、耕作制度和社会经济发展的基础上,本研究选取了撂荒现象较为突出的尼泊尔Dordi河流域作为案例研究区域。该研究区位于尼泊尔西部山区的拉姆琼县（28°8′N–28°27′N,84°24′E–84°42′E）,距首都加德满都谷地以西约200公里。研究采取了文献检索、实地调查、无人机及卫星遥感信息提取等方法开展研究。文献检索主要获取有关历史、社会和经济发展等信息信息,同时收集和分析与农业耕地状况和变化指标直接或间接相关的证据;实地调查进行了家庭调查、焦点小组讨论和深入的关键线人访谈,以形象化社会景观及其变化,从而建立山区社会、制度和管理实践的现状和历史。同时开展了地面调查,包括不同时段（1-10年期）撂荒地自然植被恢复、生物多样性、物种入侵、水土流失特征以及撂荒地周边农地及灌溉设施等变化;Google Earth Images和无人机低空遥感勘测（UAV）用于观察流域及撂荒区微地貌与植被变化。在收集和整理数据的基础上,论文首先研究了尼泊尔撂荒地的时空变化,分析了耕地撂荒的驱动因素,并讨论了尼泊尔耕地撂荒的生态环境景观后果。结果表明,尼泊尔撂荒很普遍,但在丘陵和山区更为突出。人口增长、移民、城市化、社会经济发展、自然灾害的发生、土地所有权和分配、土地分割、政治不稳定及其影响是尼泊尔耕地撂荒的主要驱动因素。撂荒导致了社会文化景观和山区生物多样性的变化,加剧了土地退化和自然灾害。这些研究成果可为尼泊尔生态环境管理和社会过程提供有用的信息（第3章）。其次,论文探讨了撂荒的社会影响。研究结果表明,农民的社会习惯包括:（i）本地劳动力交换系统“帕尔马”,（ii）传统管理的灌溉系统,（iii）饮用水供应系统,（iv）社会习惯,仪式,节日活动,（v）土着治理制度,做法和一些现有基础设施（学校、银行、卫生、岗亭、庙宇等）将随着撂荒存在被遗弃的风险。个人和社会参与土地管理做法的减少,增加了撂荒地周边农地撂荒的风险,最终将增加粮食安全风险。这些知识对于理解适当的社会过程,自然资源和环境管理至关重要（第5章）。第三,研究了撂荒地的生态环境变化、土地退化过程及风险。在被调查的全部撂荒耕地中,有92%已经完全不可逆转地受到破坏。破坏始于耕地撂荒后一年内梯田田坎的破坏和冲沟的出现,并进而引起了各种风险,例如滑坡、泥石流、岩石崩塌、沟壑的形成、土壤侵蚀和塌陷的形成,这些都增加了土地资源和植物演替的负面影响。另外研究发现,撂荒后自然恢复的植被难以在短期内阻止梯砍坍塌和冲沟的发育,因此需要进行对撂荒耕地进行管理,以降低水土流失风险。这项研究可以帮助土地规划师和环保主义者制定适当的指南（撂荒前或撂荒后）、计划和立法,以有效解决耕地撂荒的问题（第6章）。第四,研究评估了尼泊尔Dordi河流域的生态环境风险,并提出了基于风险的土地利用规划框架,以减轻风险的影响并加强可持续管理。我们采用层次分析法（AHP）,并在地理信息系统中进行了空间叠加分析,以生成生态环境风险图。Dordi河利用评价结果显示,流域面积22.36%属于高风险水平。极高、极高、中度和低度区域分别占17.38%、7.93%、28.49%和23.81%。高水平的生态环境风险主要发生在流域北部和西北部,而中等风险水平则集中在流域的南部。该风险图经实地检验,具有较高的可靠性。该风险图和基于风险的土地利用规划框架可以为制定合理的发展战略和指导方针提供信息和科学依据。同时,作为一种提高意识的工具,它还可以激活社会流程,使社区能够设计和减轻危险事件的后果（第7章）。最后,本研究为尼泊尔面临的撂荒耕地问题和发展提供了一些建议（第8章）。在尼泊尔的山区,可以采用低成本的做法利用现有的撂荒耕地,如种植经济作物或草药。尽管存在一些挑战,如（i）技术-农场所有权,规模,分布以及难以获得的其他来源（农业投入品、市场和运输）,（ii）环境（严重的水土流失、滑坡和泥石流）,（iii）社会经济挑战（贫困、劳动力短缺、文化和文化障碍）等。但研究提出的一些应对政策和策略建议,如,体制安排、一体化和主流化、资金以及在山区实施能力建设等,以及建立基于环境风险预防和减少的主动撂荒管理系统等。这些针对具体问题和挑战方面的建议,有助于促进政府和社区对山区土地的可持续管理和利用。
古兰姆·拉扎（Ghulam Raza Sargani）[9]（2020）在《基于计划行为扩展理论的中国和巴基斯坦农业创业可持续发展的比较研究》文中研究说明农业被认为是多功能的,是农村经济发展最重要的部门和综合方法之一,带来就业人口超过10亿,占全球GDP的3%,无论是微观还是宏观层面都在全球范围内具有较高的重要性。然而主流企业家精神研究却忽略了农业部门,农业相关专业的毕业生也因其动态重要性和农业学术领域的多样性而在其他行业领域开展创业活动。在过去的几年中,这种情况似乎发生了巨大变化。主要原因是农业领域的需求、供应和学术研究的动态重要性。在多个国家,对新现象和多样化现象的研究减少了对农业市场的保护,并迅速改变了农业社会,结果是农业领域经济变得更加自由化。此外,由于客户行为需求的变化、环保原则的提高、产品质量的新要求、供应链管理、食品安全性以及可持续等性,企业已越来越适应农业。因此,至关重要的是要了解更多样化的农村经济是否表现得更好,例如在个人的创收和增加就业方面。这些变化也为新进入者和企业家获得现代化农业企业家技能,适应不断变化的农业组合扫清了道路。通过新的构想,强调发展、创造和冒险,发展可持续农业综合企业,来创造可持续的未来以响应环境变化,是更好的出路。创业是全球范围内经济增长,扩张,创造岗位和就业机会的基本工具。如今,年轻一代或“Y千禧一代”的学生通常被认为是潜在的企业家。经验证,他们比以前的同龄人具有更高的耐性,更具可持续性的企业家精神,社交更广,具有更强的环保意识和经济实用性意识。本研究的首要目的是确定学生产生开始其可持续业务的主要因素,从而,设计一种与计划行为理论（TPB）联系的三重底线（TBL）或四重底线（QBL）实施机制,该机制建议采用可持续的创业模式,在可持续农业企业家对农村经济增长和发展的重要变量等方面,有别于之前的创业精神。然而由此产生的问题是,在可持续农业创业的研究和实践中,缺乏关于不同驱动因素可能影响创业意向的全面调查。因此,笔者旨在研究农业企业家是否会在他们的企业中采用可持续农业企业家精神。由于两国经济的差异,即巴基斯坦作为发展中的经济体,当前的研究选择探索中国和巴基斯坦在TPBs的驱动因素及影响因素的不同,以及农业SEIs可持续性方面的比较。然而,这却面临许多挫折和挑战。本研究主张采取一种包容性的方法,使青年参与广泛的农业食品体系,强调青年毕业生（受过高等教育的青年）参与农业部门的重要性,因此需要采取三个步骤,吸引、维持从而保留他们在农业食品部门中的地位。研究试图确定影响农业企业家创业的驱动因素,以及这些因素如何影响年轻的毕业的企业家绩效。研究结果和农业企业家精神框架强调需要进行整体（多层次）调查和可持续的路径,并采用综合方法来促进和发展不同经济体（中国和巴基斯坦）的年轻毕业生的可持续农业导向的企业家能力。这些能力必须包括增强进取的特质和技能,以及强烈的技术/专业业务管理意图。中国（新兴）经济在全球范围内逐渐具有说服力。通过解决就业问题和挑战,可持续的企业家精神同样被证明是有效的战略。在此程度上,通过发展可持续性导向的态度和意向,在农业部门开展创业活动。这项研究的主要目的是研究农业企业家中以可持续性为导向的创业意向的驱动力。特别是,扩展和适应现有的意向模型,以包括可持续性价值和对可持续发展的态度。从而,将模型带入可持续农业企业家精神的背景中,并与计划行为理论（TPB）模型的背景相结合,同时需要考虑在农业领域开展新的商业冒险业务以及现实生活中可持续企业家精神实践的评估理论。通过农业青年群体的创业教育,实现可持续的创业实践。尽管理论文献缺乏对可持续企业家精神倡议的实际见解,但可持续性价值创造的解释是否适用于可持续农村发展。我们尝试定义可持续企业家精神的概念,以更深入地探讨横截面分析现象的特征。这就是为什么我们试图通过探索可持续农业企业家精神,确定动机,挑战创业的因素以及这些企业家与“传统”企业家精神之间的差异来填补这一空白的原因。首先,研究强调了TPBs的影响,即对农业部门的企业家态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、创业导向、机会识别、创业动机意图以及可持续性创业意向。其次,该研究调查了可持续价值（经济,社会,环境和制度）,即四重底线（QBL）,这些指标在可持续农业企业家精神发展中的作用。研究从探索创业意向模型开始,并对可持续发展导向的创业意向模型进行假设。本研究的主要数据分别来自中国（n=547）和巴基斯坦（n=523）的公立大学,有效回收率为89.16%。使用SPSS 25进行描述性统计,并使用Smart PLS-SEM 3偏最小二乘和结构方程建模方法对农业学生的整体（N=1070）样本进行分析。包含了提出假设的PLS-SEM路径建模,中介和多组分析。中国与巴基斯坦受访者的人口统计学结果显示,男性占比为48.4/55.8%,女性占比为51.6/44.2%;大多数受访者（49.2/50.1%）年龄在21至30岁之间;就学年而言,大多数（37.1/36.9%）在第二年习;本科学生人数较多,分别占51.7/53.3%,45.3/42.8%的学生攻读硕士学位;而51.6/51.1%的受访者和64.7/65.0%的受访者表示他们从事农业和农业工作的时间少于一年。当被问及是否接受创业教育时,有57.2/56.2%的人表示没有进行过农业教育。同样,对于企业家知识,他们中60.1/59.8%的人回答是肯定的;父母创业者占比为42.8/45.7%;而56.3/54.5%的人表示没有创业经历。最后,在这两个经济体中,分别有52.7/52.6%,是和47.3/47.4%的人没有接受过任何农业培训。路径建模结果显示出令人鼓舞的结果。在巴基斯坦背景下,主观规范除外,创业态度、机会识别、感知行为控制、创业导向和创业动机均与（可持续创业意向）和QBL（四重底线）具有积极而重要的关系。感知行为控制,机会识别和创业动机除主观规范外,对其他变量均显示出显着的影响;而在中国背景下,对企业家的态度和创业导向有正向关系,但对SEI和QBL却没有显着的影响。进一步来说,与中国相比,巴基斯坦在主观规范、创业导向与SEI的关系可信度相对更高,关系更强烈;相反,与巴基斯坦相比,中国背景下的创业态度、感知行为控制、机会识别、创业动机与SEI的联系相对更强。同样,与中国相比,巴基斯坦在主观规范、创业动机和机会识别与QBL的关系更强信度更高;而与巴基斯坦相比,中国在个人态度、感知行为控制以及创业导向对QBL的可信度相对更高,关系更强烈。然而,与巴基斯坦相比,中国在对可持续发展价值（经济,社会,环境和制度）即四重底线（QBL）的意图相对更强,更可取。因此,假设H1a,H1b,H1c,H3a H3b,H3c,H4b,H5a,H5b,H6a,H6b,H6c,H7b,H9a,H9b,H10a,H10b,H10c,H11a,H11b,H12a,H12b H13a,H13b和H13c成立。假设H2a,H2b,H2c,H4a,H4c,H5c,H7a,H7c,H8a,H8b,H8c,H9c,H11c和H12c在两个国家的背景下都不成立。在与H14有关的中介效果验证中,模型第一维度（QBL）在TBP相关变量（ATE,SN,PBC,EO,OR,EM）与SEIs之间的中介作用在两国不同背景下,效果不同。对于中国学生的样本,所有TBP变量和SEI之间都存在QBL中介效果,所有预测因素直接或通过QBL间接解释了SEI。假设H14a–H14e则在两国样本中存在中介调节,即QBL则在ATE,PBC,EO,OR,EM与SEI之间的充当中介变量。但QBL在SN和SEI之间没有中介作用,这导致假设H14b在两国背景下均不成立。结果进一步表明,两国学生对农业部门的自我创业都表现出积极,可持续性导向的态度。研究发现对可持续性的态度变量有所贡献,这对于发展与创业发展和绩效相关的理论非常重要,而这些理论最终解释了SEI。其次,本研究旨在加强TPB的作用及其规模。此外,这些发现强调了TPB模式的有效性,描述了六个态度维度的中介作用,并在不同背景的比较下加深了对TPB的理解。第三,本文通过提供有关两种不同经济体（即效率驱动的中国和要素驱动的巴基斯坦）框架的比较研究,丰富了可持续农村发展的整合模型以及TPB模型的相关文献。研究的结果突出了可持续性收益在采用可持续性导向创业中的重要性。同时为促进可持续机会提供了见解,并讨论了可持续性创业发展的潜力。此外,研究结果还扩展了现有文献中有关可持续创业、农业部门价值创造和可持续发展的采纳度等内容,以及中国和巴基斯坦这两个亚洲国家之间与TPB相关的机会。根据我们研究结果,如果能为农业相关专业的毕业生提供商业思维、启发和引导,或是通过企业家和专家的辅导,或是在培训课程中强调商业机会的重要性,他们的创业活动将显着增加。此外,补充短期创业课程可以在实施新政策时产生奇效,应根据学生预期行为制定措施。学术界和高等院校应重新设计合适的教学方法,提高企业管理中的企业家技能,增强学生承担/忍受/规避风险的能力,从而寻找机会并成功地实施其创业想法。创新的教学方法应包括专业教师和成功的企业家,以促进创新思维和树立冒险精神,尤其是在农业相关专业的学生中。政策制定者应制定相关政策,通过保护两国青年企业家的权利,提供贷款和税收补贴,从而使学生成功地实施其企业家思想和理念。
Gebrehiwet Legese Reta[10]（2020）在《人类活动污染物对黄柏河流域水质的影响 ——多因素水质评价和模拟》文中研究表明黄柏河流域（HRB）是中国宜昌市一级饮用水源保护区,水质管理目标要达到二级标准。河流的上中下游一共修建了四个梯级水库,分别是玄庙观,天福庙,西北口和尚家河。水库总蓄水量达3.32亿立方米,HRB供水区的经济总产值占宜昌市经济总产值的近80%。就像中国和世界上所有主要河流一样,HRB因人类活动的影响已受到严重的污染。主要的人为污染源以及最大的河流水污染源是:磷矿水污染,农业面源污染和生活垃圾。近来,由于长期的采矿影响和农业面源污染,水库及沿江水体富营养化现象频繁发生,引发了宜昌市的饮用水危机问题。基于三年（2014-2016年）水质监测数据并结合应用多元分析,水质指数分析和水质模拟,本论文的主要目标是大规模人为活动对HRB水质的广泛破坏和加剧影响,并在不同的时空尺度上评价了这种影响。通过多变量分析,本研究确定了流域内有两个人为污染源组。总磷为主的污染（TP污染）和总氮为主的污染（TN污染）。上游流域玄妙观和天府庙被TP污染严重,支流比主要河流和水库的影响更差。另一方面,下游流域西北口和上家河被TN污染严重污染,对主要河流和水库的影响要比对支流的影响要差。这些发现表明,有必要减少人为污染对HRB上游支流的影响。使用水质指数分析,研究调查了HRB中的水质标准在V级（严重污染）和II级（轻微污染）之间变化。上游的水库集水区玄妙观和天府庙仅达到IV类标准,而西北口和上家河水库集水区属于II类,III类,这意味着要对人类使用的水源进行处理。TP和TN是对总水质标准变化贡献最大的受害最大的污染物。因此,必须采取更有效的管理措施来保护TP和TN对HRB饮用水源保护区的影响。使用Soil and Water Assessment Tool（SWAT）模型,模拟结果显示上游水库集水区,玄庙观和天福庙,比下游水库获得了更高的营养盐负荷,特别是TP。该结果对富营养化控制具有重要意义。因此,通过减少外部营养盐,尤其是减少导致水体快速富营养化的总磷负荷,可能是HRB水质管理的最明确措施之一。营养盐模型的校准和验证在级联的水库集水区中是一项艰巨的任务,这归因于表征水流和营养物迁移的水质动态和非线性响应。水库的水质受内部水动力因素和外部或流域特征的控制。作为一项创新成就,本研究报告了有关如何通过级联或一系列水库水体进行水和养分输送的概念化和建模的建模技术。多站点（分位置）标定和验证的应用是水文和水化学联系的水库水系统非线性响应的一种创新方法,适用于黄白河流域。最后,HRB的人为污染已显示出对水质的同时影响。因此,单一方法的应用可能无法充分解决污染物对水质的综合影响。本研究所采用的方法学、多因子水质评价与模拟技术是区分不同特征污染物的最佳途径,适用于黄柏河水质研究。为此,该方法也能推广于其他类似流域的水质研究。
二、SURVEY OF THE CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES——Ⅲ. ACTIVITIES IN EXTERNAL GEOSCIENTIFIC EXCHANGES（论文开题报告）
（1）论文研究背景及目的
此处内容要求：
首先简单简介论文所研究问题的基本概念和背景，再而简单明了地指出论文所要研究解决的具体问题，并提出你的论文准备的观点或解决方法。
写法范例：
本文主要提出一款精简64位RISC处理器存储管理单元结构并详细分析其设计过程。在该MMU结构中,TLB采用叁个分离的TLB,TLB采用基于内容查找的相联存储器并行查找,支持粗粒度为64KB和细粒度为4KB两种页面大小,采用多级分层页表结构映射地址空间,并详细论述了四级页表转换过程,TLB结构组织等。该MMU结构将作为该处理器存储系统实现的一个重要组成部分。
（2）本文研究方法
调查法：该方法是有目的、有系统的搜集有关研究对象的具体信息。
观察法：用自己的感官和辅助工具直接观察研究对象从而得到有关信息。
实验法：通过主支变革、控制研究对象来发现与确认事物间的因果关系。
文献研究法：通过调查文献来获得资料，从而全面的、正确的了解掌握研究方法。
实证研究法：依据现有的科学理论和实践的需要提出设计。
定性分析法：对研究对象进行“质”的方面的研究，这个方法需要计算的数据较少。
定量分析法：通过具体的数字，使人们对研究对象的认识进一步精确化。
跨学科研究法：运用多学科的理论、方法和成果从整体上对某一课题进行研究。
功能分析法：这是社会科学用来分析社会现象的一种方法，从某一功能出发研究多个方面的影响。
模拟法：通过创设一个与原型相似的模型来间接研究原型某种特性的一种形容方法。
三、SURVEY OF THE CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES——Ⅲ. ACTIVITIES IN EXTERNAL GEOSCIENTIFIC EXCHANGES（论文提纲范文）
（1）获取真实领导力与组织学习和创新对CPEC项目管理成功的中介效应（论文提纲范文）
| 摘要 |
| ABSTRACT |
| List of Abbreviations |
| Chapter 1 Commencement and Study Context |
| 1.1 Study Perspective and Introduction |
| 1.2 Background of the Study |
| 1.2.1 Project Management |
| 1.2.2 Contemporary studies of Project Management |
| 1.2.3 Project Success |
| 1.2.4 Authentic Leadership |
| 1.2.5 Organizational Innovation |
| 1.2.6 Organizational Learning |
| 1.3 Aim and Objectives |
| 1.4 Research Questions |
| 1.5 Significance of the Research |
| 1.6 Research Methodology |
| 1.7 Dissertation Layout |
| 1.8 Summary |
| Chapter 2 Targeted Study |
| 2.1 Introduction |
| 2.2 China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) |
| 2.3 Energy Power Projects |
| 2.3.1“Port Qasim Coal-Fired Power Plant” |
| 2.3.2 Hydropower Station (Suki Kinari) |
| 2.3.3“Coal Power Plant (Sahiwal)” |
| 2.3.4 Wind Farm Hydro China (Dawood) |
| 2.3.5 Coal Power Project Gwadar |
| 2.3.6 Quaid-E-Azam Power Project Bahawalpur (Solar Park) |
| 2.3.7“UEP Wind Farm”(Jhimpir, Thatta) |
| 2.3.8 Sachal Farm (Thatta) |
| 2.3.9 Hydropower Station (Karot) |
| 2.3.10 Three Gorges Third Wind Power Project |
| 2.3.11 Coal Power Plant (HUB) |
| 2.3.12 Kohala Hydel Project AJK |
| 2.3.13 Fuel Power Plant (Rahimyar Khan) |
| 2.3.14 Cacho Project Wind Energy |
| 2.3.15 Wind Power Project (Western Energy) |
| 2.4 Mining Projects |
| 2.4.1 (Thar) Engro Coal Field Block II Surface Mine |
| 2.4.2 Coal Field Surface Mine Thar II |
| 2.4.3 Mine Mouth Power Phase Coal Block-I &Sec (Ssrl Thar) |
| 2.4.4 Surface Mine & Mouth Oracle Plant Thar |
| 2.5 Project under Consideration |
| 2.6 Infrastructure Projects |
| 2.6.1“(Multan-Sukkur Section) Peshawar-Karachi Motorway” |
| 2.6.2 (Thakot -Havelian Section) KKH PHASE II |
| 2.6.3 Basima - Khuzdar Road |
| 2.6.4 D.I.Khan - Zhob Upgradation |
| 2.6.5 N35 KKH Thakot-Raikot |
| 2.6.6 Surab-Hoshab (N-85) |
| 2.6.7 Gwadar – Turbat – Hoshab (M-8) |
| 2.6.8 Zhob Quetta (N-50) |
| 2.6.9 D.I Khan (Yarik) –Zhob (N-50) |
| 2.6.10 D.I Khan Motorway Hakla |
| 2.6.11 Chitral to Chakdara, Link Road from Gilgit, Shandor |
| 2.6.12 Expansion and Reconstruction of ML1 |
| 2.7 Economic Zones |
| 2.7.1 Nowshera, Rashakai Economic Zone |
| 2.7.2 Special Economic Zone Dhabeji |
| 2.7.3 Development Free Zone |
| 2.8 Gwadar Projects |
| 2.8.1 Expressway (Gwadar East-Bay) |
| 2.8.2 International Airport (New Gwadar) |
| 2.8.3 Breakwaters Construction |
| 2.8.4 Berthing Areas & Channels Dredging |
| 2.8.5 Fresh Water Treatment Indispensable Facilities |
| 2.8.6 Pak-China Friendship Hospital |
| 2.8.7 Technical and Vocational Institution (Gwadar) |
| 2.8.8 Smart Master City Plan Gwadar |
| 2.8.9 Project Livelihood (Gwadar) |
| 2.9 Different Sector Projects |
| 2.9.1 Havelian Dry Port |
| 2.9.2 Optical Fiber (Cable Cross Border) |
| 2.9.3 Digital Terrestrial Multimedia Broadcast (DTMB) Project |
| 2.9.4 Early Warning System (EWS), Pakistan Meteorological Department |
| 2.9.5 Karachi Circular Railway |
| 2.9.6 Orange Line – Lahore |
| 2.9.7 Transfer of Knowledge in Different Sectors |
| 2.9.8 Transfer of Knowledge in the Education Sector |
| 2.9.9 HVDC Transmission Line Project, Matiari to Lahore |
| 2.10 Summary |
| Chapter 3 Literature Review |
| 3.1 Introduction |
| 3.2 China Pakistan Economic Corridor |
| 3.2.1 Pak-China Brotherhood |
| 3.2.2 China’s Dream |
| 3.2.3 Management of CPEC |
| 3.2.4 Structural Body |
| 3.2.5 Financial Assistance |
| 3.3 Project Management |
| 3.3.1 Ancient History of Project Management |
| 3.3.2 Project Management Four Period |
| 3.3.3 Post Project Management Fourth Eras |
| 3.3.4 Project Management Future |
| 3.3.5 The Current Project Management State |
| 3.3.6 Project Management Practice |
| 3.3.7 Project Management Objectives |
| 3.4 Project success |
| 3.4.1 Definition of Project |
| 3.4.2 Studies of Project Success Criteria |
| 3.4.3 Project Categorization |
| 3.4.4 Project Success and Different Stakeholders |
| 3.4.5 Project Manager Traits Related to Project Success |
| 3.4.6 Criteria to Measure Project Success |
| 3.4.7 Causatives of Project Success |
| 3.4.8 Belassi and Tukel’s Determined Critical Success Factors (CSPs) |
| 3.4.9 Critical Success Factors by Van der Merwe Hauptfleisch’s and Els |
| 3.4.10 Critical Success Factors by Ivanova’s and Alexandrova |
| 3.4.11 Critical Success Factors Nistor’s Belieu and Crisan |
| 3.5 Authentic Leadership |
| 3.5.1 What is Authentic? |
| 3.5.2 Defining Authenticity |
| 3.5.3 Ethics and Authentic Leadership |
| 3.5.4 Perception of Authentic Leadership Style |
| 3.5.5 Development of Authentic Leadership and Authentic Leaders |
| 3.5.6 Authentic Leadership Constituents |
| 3.5.7 Leadership Theories based AL differentiation |
| 3.5.8 Differentiating authentic and transformational leadership (TL) |
| 3.5.9 Charismatic Leadership Theories and Authentic Leadership |
| 3.5.10 Spiritual Leadership (SL), Servant Leadership and (AL) AuthenticLeadership |
| 3.6 Organizational Learning |
| 3.6.1 Experiential Theory of Learning |
| 3.6.2 Adaptive and Generative Theory of Learning |
| 3.6.3 Types of Organizational Learning |
| 3.6.4 Learning Dimensions by NEEF |
| 3.6.5 Organizational Learning and Organizational Innovation |
| 3.7 Organizational Innovation |
| 3.7.1 Previous Research Supports Innovation |
| 3.7.2 Conceptual Review |
| 3.7.3 Duality Management and Organizational Innovation |
| 3.7.4 Supported Theories to Organizational Innovation |
| 3.7.5 Ambidextrous Theory of Innovation |
| 3.7.6 Management Change and Self-Organization |
| 3.8 Summary |
| Chapter 4 Theoretical Framework |
| 4.1 Introduction |
| 4.2 The Significance of Planning a Research Design Framework |
| 4.3 Developing the Research Design Framework |
| 4.3.1 Theoretical Framework Significance |
| 4.3.2 Theoretical Framework of the Study |
| 4.3.3 Project Management |
| 4.3.4 Authentic Leadership |
| 4.3.5 Organizational Learning and Conceptual Framework |
| 4.3.6 Organizational Innovation |
| 4.3.7 Project Success (Ps) |
| 4.4 Philosophy and Research Assumptions |
| 4.4.1 Ontology |
| 4.4.2 Epistemology |
| 4.4.3 Linking Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology |
| 4.5 Development of Hypothesis |
| 4.5.1 Appraising the Authentic Leadership on OL |
| 4.5.2 Appraising the A.L. on Success of Project |
| 4.5.3 Appraising the Organizational Learning on Organization Innovation |
| 4.5.4 Appraisal of Organizational Innovation on Project Success |
| 4.5.5 Appraising the Organizational Learning on Project Success |
| 4.5.6 Appraising the Mediating Character of O.L. amid Authentic Leadership andCPEC Project Success |
| 4.5.7 Appraising the Connecting Function of O.I., O.L. and Project Success |
| 4.5.8 Appraising the Connecting Function of O.I. and O.L. amid AL and ProjectSuccess |
| 4.6 Summary |
| Chapter 5 Research Methodology |
| 5.1 Introduction |
| 5.2 Philosophy of Research |
| 5.2.1 Nature of Social Science and Related Assumptions |
| 5.2.2 Nature of Society in Assumptions |
| 5.2.3 Research Paradigms |
| 5.3 Research Approach |
| 5.4 Methodology of Research |
| 5.5 Research Strategy |
| 5.5.1 Survey Research: The Preferred Approach |
| 5.6 The Design of Research |
| 5.7 Sampling and Research Population |
| 5.8 Methods of Data Collection |
| 5.8.1 Questionnaire Development |
| 5.8.2 Design of Questionnaire |
| 5.8.3 Types of Questions |
| 5.8.4 Measurement Scales |
| 5.9 Test Pilot |
| 5.10 Main Questionnaire Survey |
| 5.10.1 Response Rate |
| 5.11 Semi-Structured Interviews |
| 5.12 Techniques of Data Analysis |
| 5.12.1 Structural Equation Modelling |
| 5.12.2 The Underlying Principle for Using AMOS |
| 5.12.3 Expending AMOS for Testing of Hypotheses |
| 5.12.4 Reliability analysis |
| 5.13 Ethical Considerations |
| 5.14 Summary |
| Chapter 6 Survey & Hypothesis Results |
| 6.1 Introduction |
| 6.2 Characteristics of Study Sample |
| 6.2.1 Characteristics of Surveyed Organizations |
| 6.3 Policies and Planning for Project Management |
| 6.3.1 Project Management Development |
| 6.3.2 Project Management vs. General Management |
| 6.3.3 Nature of Policies |
| 6.3.4 Responsibility for Developing Plans and Policies |
| 6.3.5 Expectation Level of Plan Implementation |
| 6.4 Implementation of Project Relating Innovation and Learning Programme |
| 6.4.1 Analysis Regarding Project Need |
| 6.4.2 Methods for Need Analysis |
| 6.4.3 Circumstances for Need in P.M.D |
| 6.4.4 Approaches to Innovation and Learning |
| 6.4.5 Methods Used for Development and Learning |
| 6.5 Summary of Quantitative Analysis |
| 6.6 Hypotheses Testing Introduction |
| 6.7 Descriptive Statistics |
| 6.8 Empirical Analysis |
| 6.9 Bivariate Analysis (Correlations) |
| 6.10 Multiple Regression Analysis |
| 6.11 Data Screening |
| 6.11.1 Missing Data |
| 6.11.2 Outliers Detection |
| 6.11.3 Multi-collinearity |
| 6.12 Data Exploration |
| 6.12.1 Communality Scores |
| 6.13 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (C.F.A.) |
| 6.13.1 Authentic Leadership |
| 6.13.2 Organizational Innovation |
| 6.13.3 Organizational Learning |
| 6.13.4 Project Success |
| 6.13.5 Measurement Model |
| 6.14 SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) |
| 6.14.1 Indirect Effects |
| 6.15 Testing of Hypotheses |
| 6.15.1 AL and OL |
| 6.15.2 AL and PMS |
| 6.15.3 OL and OI |
| 6.15.4 OI and PMS |
| 6.15.5 OL and PMS |
| 6.16 Summary |
| Chapter 7 Qualitative Findings |
| 7.1 Introduction |
| 7.2 Semi-structured Interviews |
| 7.3 Background Information |
| 7.4 Usage of Project Management Practices |
| 7.5 Feature Influencing the Project Management |
| 7.6 Apparent Advantages of PMP |
| 7.7 Complications in Assessing AL, OI, OL and Project Success |
| 7.8 Summary |
| Chapter 8 Discussion, Contribution and Recommendation |
| 8.1 Introduction |
| 8.2 Leading Research Outcomes |
| 8.3 Research Question and Hypothesis Testing Assessment |
| 8.3.1 Impact of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Learning |
| 8.3.2 Impact of Authentic Leadership on CPEC Project Success |
| 8.3.3 Impact of Organizational Learning on Organization Innovation |
| 8.3.4 Impact of Organizational Innovation on CPEC Project Success |
| 8.3.5 Impact of Organizational Learning on CPEC Project Success |
| 8.3.6 Mediating Role of Organizational Learning between Authentic Leadershipand CPEC Project Success |
| 8.3.7 Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation between Organization Learningand CPEC Project Success |
| 8.3.8 Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation and Organizational Learningbetween Authentic Leadership and CPEC Project Success |
| 8.4 Authentic Leadership and Project Success |
| 8.5 Authentic Leadership and Organizational Learning |
| 8.6 Organizational Learning and Organizational Innovation |
| 8.7 Organizational learning and Project Success |
| 8.8 Organizational Innovation and Project Success |
| 8.9 Summary |
| Chapter 9 Final Conclusion |
| 9.1 Introduction |
| 9.2 Summarized Version of Research Outcomes |
| 9.3 Research Contribution |
| 9.4 Implementations of the Study |
| 9.4.1 Theoretical, Methodological and Contextual Implications |
| 9.4.2 Validation of the Discussed Variables |
| 9.4.3 Managerial Level Policy Implications |
| 9.4.4 Government Level Policy Implications |
| 9.5 Limitations of the Study |
| 9.6 Future Directions and Recommendations |
| 9.7 Epilogue |
| Reference |
| Appendix |
| Acknowledgement |
| Dedication |
（4）Features and values of geological heritage resources in Shunping County, Hebei Province（论文提纲范文）
| Introduction |
| 1 Geological background of Shunping County |
| 2 Types of geological heritage in Shun-ping County |
| 3 Assessment of geological heritage resources in Shunping County |
| 4 Value of geological heritage resources |
| 4.1 Earth science value |
| 4.2 Aesthetic value |
| 4.3 Cultural value |
| 4.4 Ecological value |
| 4.5 Public education value |
| 5 Conclusions |
（5）低温热液矿床地质与地球化学研究 ——以中国贵州天柱金矿和尼日利亚Mika铀矿为例（论文提纲范文）
| ABSTRACT |
| 摘要 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction |
| 1.1 Low-T hydrthermal/epithermal deposits |
| 1.2 Background and motivation |
| 1.3 Thesis outline |
| Chapter 2 Low-T hydrothermal/Epithermal systems |
| 2.1 Definition |
| 2.2 Classification of epithermal deposits |
| 2.3 Characters of igneous rocks associated with epithermal deposits |
| 2.4 Examples of epithermal gold deposits and uranium deposits |
| 2.5 How to form a giant epithermal precious metal deposit |
| Chapter 3 The turbidite-hosted gold deposit in Tianzhu, Guizhou |
| 3.1 Geological background of the Guizhou gold deposits |
| 3.2 Regional Geology |
| 3.2.1 Introduction |
| 3.2.2 Strata |
| 3.2.3 Mineralization |
| 3.2.4 Features of the ore deposits |
| 3.3 Sampling and analytical methods |
| 3.4 Results |
| 3.5 Discussion |
| 3.5.1 Age of rocks from Qingshuijiang Formation |
| 3.5.2 Source and tectonic settings of rocks |
| 3.5.3 Source of the sulfur and gold |
| 3.5.4 Genesis and age of these gold deposits |
| 3.5.5 Mechanism of Gold Enrichments |
| 3.5.6 Comparisons between Tianzhu and similar gold deposits |
| 3.6 Summmary |
| Chapter 4 Geology and geochemistry of Mika uranium region, Northeastern Nigeria |
| 4.1 Introduction of the Mika uranium exploration site |
| 4.2 History of geological exploration |
| 4.3 Physiography and climate |
| 4.4 Regional geology |
| 4.5 Local geology |
| 4.6 Uranium mineralization |
| 4.7 The first survey and its radiometric and gamma dose measurement |
| 4.8 Uranium Prospects |
| 4.9 Petrography |
| 4.10 Sample test |
| 4.11 Summary |
| Chapter 5 Formation of Low-temperature hydrothermal deposits:A comparison study |
| 5.1 Foramtions of the low-temperature hydrothermal deposits |
| 5.2 Comparisons between the Tianzhu Au deposit and Mika U deposit |
| Chapter 6 Conclusions |
| Acknowledgements |
| References |
| Appendix |
（6）氨基酸示踪中印热带河流沉积物和悬浮颗粒物中有机质的保存、组成和转化（论文提纲范文）
| 摘要 |
| ABSTRACT |
| Abbreviation of terms |
| CHAPTER Ⅰ GENERAL INTRODUCTION |
| 1.1 The Nitrogen Cycle:Implication and Challenges |
| 1.2 Riverine Delivery:Past,Present and Future |
| 1.3 Organic Matter(OM)Cycling and Preservation in the Rivers and Estuaries |
| 1.4 Amino Acid Indicators– Formation,Transformation and Implications |
| 1.5 Sources and Diagenetic,and Influencing Factors |
| 1.6 Knowledge Existing and Gaps |
| 1.7 Importance of the Tracer Technique and Objectives |
| 1.8 Structure of the thesis |
| CHAPTER Ⅱ MATERIALS AND METHODS |
| 2.1 Description of Study Area |
| 2.1.1 Climate and monsoon patters of the Indian peninsula |
| 2.1.2 Geomorphology and fluvial load |
| 2.1.3 Land use pattern along the WCI |
| 2.2 The Narmada River system |
| 2.2.1 Geology of the Narmada River system |
| 2.2.2 Land use pattern of the Narmada River System |
| 2.3 The Netravati River basin |
| 2.3.1 Geology of the Netravati River system |
| 2.3.2 Land use pattern of the Netravati River system |
| 2.4 The Zuari River system |
| 2.4.1 Geology of the ZRS |
| 2.4.2 Land use pattern within the ZRS |
| 2.5 The Nandujiang/Nandu River(Hainan,China) |
| 2.5.1 Geomorphology,precipitation and fluvial load |
| 2.5.2 Land use pattern within the NDR |
| 2.6 Sample collection and pre-treatment |
| 2.6.1 Water sample and surface or bank sediments |
| 2.6.2 Sample pre-treatment and in-situ measurements |
| 2.7 Analytical methods |
| 2.7.1 Grain size analysis |
| 2.7.2 Surface area analysis |
| 2.7.3 Bulk chemical analysis(elemental contents,isotopes) |
| 2.7.3.1 CHNOS analyzer |
| 2.7.3.2 Finnigan EA1112- Delta plus XP IRMS |
| 2.7.4 Amino acid analyses |
| 2.7.4.1 Experimental preparation and description |
| 2.7.4.2 Qualitative and quantitative estimations of total hydrolyzable amino acids(THAA)in standards and samples |
| 2.7.4.3 Preparation of primary standard |
| 2.7.4.4 Preparation of secondary standard |
| 2.7.4.5 Sample pretreatment for THAA analysis |
| 2.7.4.6 Quantification of AA |
| 2.7.4.7 Amino Acid recovery rate |
| 2.7.4.8 Calculation of Degradation Index(DI) |
| 2.8 Data processing and statistics |
| 2.8.1 Multivariate statistical analysis |
| 2.8.2 Principal component analysis(PCA) |
| 2.8.3 Cluster Analyses(CA) |
| CHAPTER Ⅲ Distribution and behavioral changes of organic matter form sediments of a small tropical river- Netravati River,India |
| 3.1 Introduction |
| 3.2 Materials and methods |
| 3.2.1 Sampling sites and sample collection |
| 3.3 Results |
| 3.3.1 Spatial and temporal variations in rainfall and hydrographic parameters |
| 3.3.2 Distribution of bulk parameters and elemental compositions |
| 3.3.3 Grain size and surface area of bulk sediments |
| 3.3.4 Seasonal distribution of AA compositions |
| 3.3.5 Correlation among the measured parameters |
| 3.4 Discussion |
| 3.4.1 The effect of seasonal variations on water and sediment chemistry |
| 3.4.2 Source of organic matter in small tropical rivers |
| 3.4.3 Factors controlling diagenesis of OM in small tropical rivers |
| 3.4.4 The fate of OM in the Netravati River |
| 3.5 Summary |
| CHAPTER Ⅳ Sources and preservation dynamics of organic matter with special reference to amino acids in surface sediments of Narmada River,India |
| 4.1 Introduction |
| 4.2 Material and Methods |
| 4.2.1 Study area |
| 4.2.2 Sampling sites and sample collection |
| 4.3 Results |
| 4.3.1 Hydrographic,chlorophyll a and bulk sediment parameters |
| 4.3.2 Bulk chemical parameters and surface area(SA) |
| 4.3.3 Spatial and temporal distribution of THAA |
| 4.3.4 Principal component analysis and correlations among variables |
| 4.4 Discussion |
| 4.4.1 The sources of OM to sediments of the Narmada River |
| 4.4.2 Diagenetic characteristics of sedimentary OM of Narmada River |
| 4.4.3 Factors controlling the distribution of sedimentary OM |
| 4.5 Summary |
| CHAPTER Ⅴ Seasonal study of the sources and implications of particulate organic matter from a small tropical river- Zuari River,India |
| 5.1 Introduction |
| 5.2 Materials and methods |
| 5.2.1 Sampling sites and sample collection |
| 5.3 Results |
| 5.3.1 Physical,biological and ancillary parameters |
| 5.3.2 Bulk geochemical parameters |
| 5.3.3 Biomarkers and allied indices |
| 5.3.4 Correlation and principal component analyses(PCA) |
| 5.4 Discussion |
| 5.4.1 The sources of OM in Zuari River and estuary |
| 5.4.2 Quantification of OM in the Zuari River and estuary |
| 5.4.3 Diagenesis of POM within the ETM |
| 5.5 Summary |
| CHAPTER Ⅵ Sources,characteristics and dispersal of particulate organic matter(POM)with respect to organic nitrogen(ON)during episodic climatic events,case study of Nandu River,Hainan,China |
| 6.1 Introduction |
| 6.2 Materials and methods |
| 6.2.1 Study area |
| 6.2.2 Sampling sites and sample collection |
| 6.3 Results |
| 6.3.1 Spatial and temporal variation of hydrographic parameters |
| 6.3.2 Distribution of elemental compositions and isotopic characteristics |
| 6.3.3 Seasonal distribution of AA compositions |
| 6.3.4 Principal component analyses cluster analyses and correlation among the measured parameters |
| 6.4 Discussion |
| 6.4.1 The effect of seasonal variations |
| 6.4.2 Source of organic matter in NRE |
| 6.4.3 Factors controlling diagenesis of OM in NRE |
| 6.4.4 The fate of OM in the Nandu River |
| 6.5 Summary |
| CHAPTER Ⅶ General discussion and conclusions |
| 7.1 Introduction |
| 7.2 Conceptual model |
| 7.3 Synthesis |
| 7.4 Importance of the study |
| 7.5 Conclusions and recommendations |
| 7.6 Future Plans |
| References |
| APPENDIX |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
（8）尼泊尔山区耕地撂荒的社会与生态环境风险研究（论文提纲范文）
| 摘要 |
| abstract |
| Chapter 1 Introduction |
| 1.1 Background and significance |
| 1.1.1 Mountain eco-environment- global perspectives |
| 1.1.2 Statement of problems |
| 1.2 Singnificance of the study |
| 1.3 Objectives of the study |
| 1.4 Research contents and organisation of the study |
| Chapter 2 Review on farmland abondonment and its driving factors |
| 2.1 Global studies on farmland abondonment |
| 2.2 Global persepective on driving factors of farmland abondonment |
| Chapter 3 Research methodology;materials and methods |
| 3.1 Introduction |
| 3.2 Key terms-definition |
| 3.2.1 Farmland abandonment |
| 3.2.2 Hazard |
| 3.2.3 Vulnerability |
| 3.2.4 Exposure |
| 3.2.5 Risk |
| 3.2.6 Social and eco-environmental risk |
| 3.2.7 Eco-environmental risk assessment(ERA) |
| 3.3 Conceptualizing and theorizing farmland abandonment landscape and assessment of social/eco-environmental risks |
| 3.4 Study framework |
| 3.5 Research activities |
| 3.5.1 Pre field |
| 3.5.2 Field activities |
| 3.5.3 Post field activities |
| 3.6 Conclusions |
| Chapter 4 Charecteristics of the case study area |
| 4.1 Introduction |
| 4.2 Overview of Nepal |
| 4.2.1 Mountain context and social vulnerability in Nepal |
| 4.2.2 Mountainous farmland and farming system in Nepal |
| 4.3 Dordi river basin |
| 4.3.1 Administrative and bio-physical setting |
| 4.3.2 Socio-economic attributes |
| 4.4 Status of farmland degradation in Nepal |
| 4.5 Conclusions |
| Chapter 5 Farmland abondonment driving factors and its socio-ecoenvironmental consequences in Nepal |
| 5.1 Introduction |
| 5.2 Materials and methods |
| 5.2.1 Sources of data |
| 5.2.2 Methods for data analysis |
| 5.3 Results |
| 5.3.1 The spatiotemporal distribution of abondoned farmland in Nepal |
| 5.3.2 Driving factors of farmland abandonment |
| 5.3.3 Eco-environmental and social consequences of farmland abondonment |
| 5.4 Discussions |
| 5.5 Conclusions |
| Chapter 6 Social risks of farmland abondonment |
| 6.1 Introduction |
| 6.2 Materials and methods |
| 6.2.1 Household data and sampling |
| 6.2.2 Focus group discussion(FGD)and key informants interview(KII) |
| 6.2.3 Selection of site specific driving factors and multivariate regression analysis |
| 6.2.4 Framing of social risk and analysis through hazards of place-model of vulnerability |
| 6.3 Results and discussion |
| 6.3.1 Determining site specific driving factors of farmland abandonment |
| 6.3.2 Risks on social system |
| 6.4 Conclusions |
| Chapter 7 Eco-environmental vulnerability and associated risks |
| 7.1 Introduction |
| 7.2 Materials and methods |
| 7.2.1 Data acquisition and processing |
| 7.2.2 Delineation and characterization of abandoned farmland |
| 7.2.3 Assessment of spatiotemporal degradation of farmland |
| 7.2.4 Selection of causes of farmland degradation |
| 7.2.5 Analysis of hazard/risk |
| 7.3 Results |
| 7.3.1 Assessment of abandoned farmland spatiotemporal degradation |
| 7.3.2 Identification of major causes of degradation and statistical analysis |
| 7.3.3 Eco-environmental vulnerability associated with abondoned farmlands |
| 7.3.4 Eco-environmental risks associated with the abandoned farmlands |
| 7.4 Discussions |
| 7.5 Conclusions |
| Chapter 8 Development of evluation index and risk assessment |
| 8.1 Introduction |
| 8.2 Materials and methods |
| 8.2.1 Data collection and processing |
| 8.2.2 Selection of criteria and construction of assessment indicator system |
| 8.2.4 Determine relative importance of different criteria |
| 8.2.5 Risk calculation and classification of results |
| 8.2.6 Development of a framework for landuse planning |
| 8.3 Result and discussions |
| 8.3.1 Spatial Distribution of Eco-environmental Risk |
| 8.3.2 Landuse planning framework |
| 8.4 Conclusions |
| Chapter 9 Summary, conclusion,recommendations, challenges and policy messages |
| 9.1 Summary and conclusion |
| 9.2 Recommendations |
| 9.2.1 Introduction of abandoned farmland for low cost practices and eco-friendly farming |
| 9.2.2 Adoptation for cash crops or as sources of medicinal herbs |
| 9.3 Challenges |
| 9.3.1 Technical challenges |
| 9.3.2 Environmental challenges |
| 9.3.3 Socio-economic challenges |
| 9.4 Policy messages |
| 9.4.1 Institutional arrangement,integration and mainstreaming |
| 9.4.2 Finance |
| 9.4.3 Capacity building |
| References |
| Appendix 1 中文简本 |
| Appendix 2 Survey Questionaire Form |
| Appendix 3–PUBLISHED PAPER/CONTRIBUTION |
| Acknowledgements |
| CV of author and Research Contribution |
（9）基于计划行为扩展理论的中国和巴基斯坦农业创业可持续发展的比较研究（论文提纲范文）
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
| Abstract |
| 摘要 |
| List of Acronyms and Abbreviations |
| CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION |
| 1.1 Background of Research |
| 1.2 Scope of the study |
| 1.3 Research Questions |
| 1.4 Study Aim and Objectives |
| 1.4.1 The current research draws the following objectives |
| 1.5 Significance of the study |
| 1.6 The Study Context,and Respondents |
| 1.7 Pakistan’s Contextual Evidences |
| 1.7.1 General Context and Background |
| 1.7.2 Pakistan's Agriculture and Economic Trend |
| 1.7.3 Entrepreneurship Activity |
| 1.7.4 Higher Education Institutes and Entrepreneurship Education |
| 1.8 China’s Contextual Evidences |
| 1.8.1 General Context and Background |
| 1.8.2 China’s Agriculture and Economic Trend |
| 1.8.3 Entrepreneurship Activity |
| 1.8.4 Higher Educational Institutes and Entrepreneurship Education |
| 1.9 The Study Contribution |
| 1.10 Structure of Thesis |
| CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW |
| 2.1 Historical Review of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.2 Entrepreneurship or Entrepreneur Concepts |
| 2.3 Entrepreneurship School of Thoughts |
| 2.3.1 Early Thoughts on Entrepreneurship |
| 2.3.2 Thoughts of Entrepreneurship in Classical and Neoclassical Era |
| 2.3.3 Neo-Austrian Entrepreneur's Thoughts |
| 2.4 Entrepreneurship Intention |
| 2.5 Entrepreneurship Education |
| 2.5.1 Development of Entrepreneurship Education |
| 2.5.2 Importance of Entrepreneurship Education |
| 2.5.3 Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Attitude and Intention |
| 2.5.4 Promoting Entrepreneurship Education in High Institutions |
| 2.6 Different Perspective of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.6.1 Economic Perspective of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.6.2 Psychological Perspective of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.6.3 Sociological Perceptive of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.6.4 Sustainability Perceptive of Entrepreneurship |
| 2.7 Literature Gap |
| 2.8 Conclusion of Chapter |
| CHAPTER 3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS |
| 3.1 Theory of Reasoned Action(TRA) |
| 3.2 Theory of Planned Behavior(TPB) |
| 3.2.1 Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intention(SEI) |
| 3.2.2 Attitude towards Entrepreneurship(ATE) |
| 3.2.3 Subjective Norms(SN) |
| 3.2.4 Perceived behavioral control(PBC) |
| 3.2.5 Entrepreneurial Orientation(EO) |
| 3.2.6 Opportunity Recognition(OR) |
| 3.2.7 Entrepreneurship Motivation(EM) |
| 3.3 Triple Bottom line(TBL) |
| 3.4 Quadruple Bottom Line(QBL) |
| 3.5 Theory Building or Post-Test Model |
| 3.6 Theory Testing |
| 3.7 Conceptual Approach |
| 3.8 Conceptual Framework and Study Model |
| 3.9 Main Study Hypotheses Development |
| 3.10 Conclusion of Chapter |
| CHAPTER 4 MATERIAL AND METHODS |
| 4.1 Research Paradigm |
| 4.2 Research Philosophy |
| 4.2.1 Positivism approach |
| 4.2.2 Phenomenological Approach |
| 4.2.3 Review of Different Philosophies for Current Research |
| 4.3 Survey Choice and Research strategy |
| 4.4 Quantitative Methods |
| 4.5 Research Design |
| 4.6 Research Instrument and Measurement Scales |
| 4.7 Development of Survey Questionnaire |
| 4.7.1 Demography |
| 4.7.2 Pilot study |
| 4.8 Research Protocol |
| 4.8.1 Reliability and Validity |
| 4.9 Main study |
| 4.9.1 Cross-Sectional Study |
| 4.9.2 Population and Sampling Size |
| 4.9.3 Data Collection Procedure and Empirical Approach |
| 4.9.4 Targeted Samples and Screening of Data |
| 4.9.5 Data Coding,Cleaning,and Entry |
| 4.9.6 Ethical Consideration |
| 4.10 Analysis Techniques and Statistical Packages |
| 4.10.1 Structural Equation Model Analysis Approach |
| 4.11 Partial Least Structural Equation Model Approach |
| 4.11.1 Factor Loadings |
| 4.11.2 Bootstrapped Significance Output |
| 4.11.3 Assessing Model Fit |
| 4.11.4 Measurement Fit for Reflective Models |
| 4.11.5 Composite Reliability(CR) |
| 4.11.6 Cronbach's Alpha(α) |
| 4.11.7 Average Variance Extracted(AVE) |
| 4.11.8 Fornell–Larcker Discriminant Validity Criterion |
| 4.11.9 Standardized Root Means Square Residual(SRMR) |
| 4.11.10 Multicollinearity in Reflective Models |
| 4.11.11 Criterion Validity |
| 4.11.12 Path Loading Significance |
| 4.11.13 Structural Path Coefficients |
| 4.11.14 R-Square |
| 4.11.15 Adjusted R~2 |
| 4.11.16 Multi-Group Analysis(MGA) |
| 4.11.17 Measurement Invariance |
| 4.12 Assessment of Measurement Model |
| 4.13 Measurement Items and Constructs for Study 1 |
| 4.14 Measurement Items and Constructs for Study 2 |
| 4.15 Hypotheses Testing |
| 4.16 Conclusion of the Chapter |
| CHAPTER 5 Cross Culture Comparasion of the Sustainable Development of Agricultural Entrepreneurship Between Emerging Economy and Developing Country |
| 5.1 Introduction |
| 5.2 Analytical Findings and Discussion |
| 5.2.1 Demographic Detail of The Participants |
| 5.2.2 Factor Loading and Data Analysis |
| 5.3 Path Analysis and Hypotheses Testing |
| 5.3.1 Construct Reliability and Validity Analysis |
| 5.4 Main study Path analysis and Tested Hypothesis |
| 5.4.1 Mediational Analysis |
| 5.4.2 Multigroup Analysis China Vs.Pakistan |
| 5.5 Discovery of the Study |
| 5.6 Conclusion of Chapter |
| CHAPTER 6 Sustainable Entrepreneurship in the Agriculture Sector:The Nexus of Triple Bottom Line Measurement Approach |
| 6.1 Introduction |
| 6.2 Material and Methods |
| 6.2.1 Sampling and Data Collection |
| 6.2.2 Structural Model Analysis |
| 6.2.3 Hypotheses of the Study |
| 6.3 Results and Discussion |
| 6.4 Conclusion of Chapter |
| CHAPTER 7 DISCUSSION |
| 7.1 Population and Sampling Issues |
| 7.2 Measurement of Scale Refinement |
| 7.3 Reliability and Validity Test |
| 7.4 Proposed Hypotheses Testing |
| 7.4.1 Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship(ATE) |
| 7.4.2 Subjective Norms(SN) |
| 7.4.3 Perceived Behavioral Control(PBC) |
| 7.4.4 Entrepreneurial Orientation(EO) |
| 7.4.5 Opportunities Recognition(OR) |
| 7.4.6 Entrepreneurial Motivation(EM) |
| 7.4.7 Quadruple Bottom Line(QBL) |
| 7.5 Conclusion of the Chapter |
| CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSIONS |
| 8.1 Research Implications |
| 8.1.1 Theoretical Implications |
| 8.1.2 Practical Implications |
| 8.1.3 Methodological Implications |
| 8.2 Research limitations |
| 8.2.1 Theoretical limitations |
| 8.2.2 Methodological Limitations |
| 8.3 Academic Implementation and Policy Implications |
| 8.4 Future Research Avenues |
| 8.4.1 Usage of other Concerned Theories |
| 8.4.2 Need of Multidimensional Constructs Models |
| 8.4.3 Context and Generalization |
| 8.5 Achievement of Objectives |
| 8.6 Novel Contribution of the Study |
| 8.7 Study Recommendations |
| 8.8 Final Thoughts |
| 8.9 Conclusion |
| REFERENCES |
| APPENDICES Covering letter |
| APPENDIX A |
| APPENDIX B |
| APPENDIX C |
| List of Publications |
（10）人类活动污染物对黄柏河流域水质的影响 ——多因素水质评价和模拟（论文提纲范文）
| 内容摘要 |
| Abstract |
| 1.General Introduction |
| 1.1.Research Background |
| 1.2.Research Problem |
| 1.3.Research Question |
| 1.4.Aim and Objectives |
| 1.5.Research Methodology |
| 1.6.Significance of the Study |
| 1.7.Thesis Outline |
| 2.Literature Review |
| 2.1.Sustainable Water Quality Management |
| 2.2.Water Pollution:Cause and Effect Factors |
| 2.2.1.Cause of Water Pollution |
| 2.2.2.Effects of Water Pollution |
| 2.3.Water Quality Assessment |
| 2.3.1.Water Quality Monitoring |
| 2.3.2.Choice of Water Quality Parameters for Monitoring |
| 2.4.Water Quality Data Analysis |
| 2.4.1.Multivariate Statistical Analysis Methods |
| 2.4.2.Water Quality Index Methods |
| 2.4.3.Watershed Nutrients Load modeling |
| 2.5.Summary of Literature Review and Research Gaps |
| 3.Description of the Study Area |
| 3.1.Geographic Location |
| 3.2.Environmental Setting |
| 3.3.Economic and Social Settings |
| 3.4.Hydrological Setting |
| 3.5.Water Resources Utilization |
| 3.6.Main Water-Environmental problems |
| 3.6.1.Mining Pollution |
| 3.6.2.Agricultural Pollution |
| 3.6.3.Domestic garbage and sewage discharge pollution |
| 3.6.4.Algae growth in the main reservoirs |
| 3.7.Monitoring Stations |
| 3.7.1.Hydro-Meteorological Stations |
| 3.7.2.Water Quality Monitoring Stations |
| 4.Spatiotemporal Variations of Water Quality Variables |
| 4.1.Introduction |
| 4.2.Materials and Methods |
| 4.2.1.Water Quality Monitoring and Analytical Method |
| 4.2.2.Multivariate Analysis Method |
| 4.3.Results |
| 4.3.1.Descriptive Statistics Result |
| 4.3.2.Principal Component Analysis Result |
| 4.3.3.Cluster Analysis Result |
| 4.3.4.Discriminate Analysis Result |
| 4.4.Discussion |
| 4.5.Summary |
| 5.Water Quality Standard of Hungbaihe River Water |
| 5.1.Introduction |
| 5.2.Materials and Methods |
| 5.2.1.Water Quality Monitoring and Analytical Method |
| 5.2.2.Water Quality Index Analysis Method |
| 5.3.Result |
| 5.3.1.EQSSW Analysis Result |
| 5.3.2.WAWQI Analysis Result |
| 5.4.Discussion |
| 5.4.1.Water Quality Standards of Huangbaihe River water |
| 5.4.2.Dominant Pollutants |
| 5.4.3.Evaluation of Water quality Standard of Huangbaihe River basin |
| 5.5.Summary |
| 6.Watershed Nutrients Loading of Huangbaihe River Basin |
| 6.1.Introduction |
| 6.2.Materials and Methods |
| 6.2.1.Hydro-Meteorological Data |
| 6.2.2.Water Quality Monitoring and Analytical method |
| 6.2.3.The Soil and Water Assessment Tool Modeling Basics |
| 6.2.4.SWAT Model Setup |
| 6.2.5.Model calibration and Evaluation |
| 6.3.Result |
| 6.3.1.Stream Flow Calibration and Validation Result |
| 6.3.2.Nutrients load Calibration and Validation Result |
| 6.3.3.Nutrients Load Prediction into Cascaded Reservoirs |
| 6.3.4.Watershed(Sub-basin)Nutrients Load |
| 6.4.Discussion |
| 6.4.1.SWAT Model Result Evaluation |
| 6.4.2.Implication of the Study for Water Quality Management |
| 6.4.3.Model Uncertainties |
| 6.5.Summary |
| 7.Conclusions and Recommendation |
| 7.1.Conclusions |
| 7.2.Contributions of the Study |
| 7.3.Outlook:Recommendation for Further Studies |
| 8.Reference |
| Appendix:1 Stream flow calibration parameters |
| Appendix:2 Total phosphorus load calibration parameters |
| Appendix:3 Total nitrogen load calibration parameters |
| Appendix:4 List of Nomenclatures |
| Appendix:5 Academic Works Published during the Ph D work |
| Acknowledgements |
四、SURVEY OF THE CHINESE ACADEMY OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES——Ⅲ. ACTIVITIES IN EXTERNAL GEOSCIENTIFIC EXCHANGES（论文参考文献）
- [1]获取真实领导力与组织学习和创新对CPEC项目管理成功的中介效应[D]. Ahsan Nawaz. 河北大学, 2021(11)
- [2]Research achievements of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on 60 years of aeromagnetic surveys[J]. Sheng-qing Xiong. China Geology, 2021(01)
- [3]吉林省浑江市幅1∶50000水系沉积物测量原始数据集[J]. 吴玉诗,王海建,车海龙,赵虹旭,马录录,李爱民,刘臣臣,孙冬雪,马铭,李东宇. 中国地质, 2020(S2)
- [4]Features and values of geological heritage resources in Shunping County, Hebei Province[J]. YANG Jin-song,LIU Zhe,WANG Xiang-dong,ZHAO Hua,SONG lei,LIU Tai-bei,WANG Cheng-min,ZHANG Peng. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2020(04)
- [5]低温热液矿床地质与地球化学研究 ——以中国贵州天柱金矿和尼日利亚Mika铀矿为例[D]. Hin-yuen Tsang（曾献源）. 中国科学技术大学, 2020(01)
- [6]氨基酸示踪中印热带河流沉积物和悬浮颗粒物中有机质的保存、组成和转化[D]. Fernandes Dearlyn Mario. 华东师范大学, 2020(02)
- [7]Main active faults and seismic activity along the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on remote sensing geological survey[J]. Zhong-hai Wu,Chun-jing Zhou,Xiao-long Huang,Gen-mo Zhao,Cheng-xuan Tan. China Geology, 2020(02)
- [8]尼泊尔山区耕地撂荒的社会与生态环境风险研究[D]. Suresh Chaudhary. 中国科学院大学(中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所), 2020(01)
- [9]基于计划行为扩展理论的中国和巴基斯坦农业创业可持续发展的比较研究[D]. 古兰姆·拉扎（Ghulam Raza Sargani）. 华中农业大学, 2020(08)
- [10]人类活动污染物对黄柏河流域水质的影响 ——多因素水质评价和模拟[D]. Gebrehiwet Legese Reta. 三峡大学, 2020(06)