一、Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins（论文文献综述）
Dangpeng XI,Xiaoqiao WAN,Guobiao LI,Gang LI[1]（2019）在《Cretaceous integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China》文中研究表明Cretaceous strata are widely distributed across China and record a variety of depositional settings. The sedimentary facies consist primarily of terrestrial, marine and interbedded marine-terrestrial deposits, of which marine and interbedded facies are relatively limited. Based a thorough review of the subdivisions and correlations of Cretaceous strata in China, we provide an up-to-date integrated chronostratigraphy and geochronologic framework of the Cretaceous system and its deposits in China.Cretaceous marine and interbedded marine-terrestrial sediments occur in southern Tibet, Karakorum, the western Tarim Basin,eastern Heilongjiang and Taiwan. Among these, the Himalayan area has the most complete marine deposits, the foraminiferal and ammonite biozonation of which can be correlated directly to the international standard biozones. Terrestrial deposits in central and western China consist predominantly of red, lacustrine-fluvial, clastic deposits, whereas eastern China, a volcanically active zone, contains clastic rocks in association with intermediate to acidic igneous rocks and features the most complete stratigraphic successions in northern Hebei, western Liaoning and the Songliao Basin. Here, we synthesise multiple stratigraphic concepts and charts from southern Tibet, northern Hebei to western Liaoning and the Songliao Basin to produce a comprehensive chronostratigraphic chart. Marine and terrestrial deposits are integrated, and this aids in the establishment of a comprehensive Cretaceous chronostratigraphy and temporal framework of China. Further research into the Cretaceous of China will likely focus on terrestrial deposits and mutual authentication techniques（e.g., biostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy）. This study provides a more reliable temporal framework both for studying Cretaceous geological events and exploring mineral resources in China.
王亚琼,沙金庚,泮燕红,张晓林,饶馨[2]（2012）在《中国非海相白垩纪介形类化石组合》文中研究指明我国非海相白垩纪介形类化石可以划分为7个组合:1)分布于我国西北和西南地区欧特里沃期巴列姆期的Jingguella-Minheella-Pinnocypridea组合;2)分布于我国西北和西南地区巴列姆期的Cypridea-Latonia-Darwinula组合;3)阿普特期阿尔必期的Cypridea（Morinina）-Bisulcocypridea-Mongolocypris组合;4)分布于我国东北、中部及东部地区欧特里沃期巴列姆期的Cypridea-Mongolianella-Darwinula组合;5)分布于我国东北、中部及东部地区巴列姆期阿普特期的Cypridea（Cypridea）-Cypridea（Ulwellia）-Limnocypridea组合;6)塞诺曼期塞农期的Cypridea-Triangulicypris-Sunliavia-Lycopterocypris组合;7)坎潘期马斯特里赫特期的Talicypridea-Cypridea-Quadracypris-Candona组合。依据以上7个介形类化石组合,我国22个地区含介形类的73个地层单元（群/组）得到了对比。
Liu Junying;Chen Zhongliang Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing Panxi Geological Party, Sichuan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Xichang Liu Linqun[3]（1992）在《Discovery of Fossil Charophytes from the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation and Early Jurassic Lower Yimen Formation, Sichuan Province, and Its Significance》文中研究指明 This paper describes the fossil charophytes collected from the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Dazuand Early Jurassic Lower Yimen Formation in Xichang, Sichuan Province, and their significance. Up to now,papers dealing with fossil charophytes of the Late Triassic, especially of the Early Jurassic, have been rarelypublished. The description of the two new species of Porochara, P. dazuensis and P. xichangensis, and theirfossil assemblage not only provides an important basis for classification and correlation of red beds insouthwestern China but reveals for the first time the features of the charophyte flora of the Late Triassic-EarlyJurassic in the area, thus offering valuable data for the establishment of Triassic and Jurassic charophyte fossilzones in China.
WAN Xiaoqiao~(1,2)CHEN Peiji~3 WEI Mingjian~1 1 Capital Normal University,105 Xishanhuan Beilu,Beijing 100037 2 China University of Geosciences,29 Xueyuan Road,Beijing 100083 3 Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing,Jiangsu 210008[4]（2007）在《The Cretaceous System in China》文中研究指明This paper provides an outline of Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleogeography in China, which is based on rich data obtained from recent researches.Cretaceous deposits are widespread in China.Most strata are of nonmarine origin and marine sediments occur only in Tibet,western Tarim Basin of Xinjiang,Taiwan and limited localities of eastern Heilongjiang.All deposits are rich in fossils and well-constrained biostratigraphically.The stratigraphic successions of different regions are illustrated,and general stratigraphic division and correlation have been introduced.The marine deposits are described in the Tibetan Tethys,Kashi-Hotan Region of Xinjiang,eastern Heilongjiang, western Yunnan and Taiwan;the nonmarine deposits are outlined from northeast China,southeast China,southern interior China,southwest China,the Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia region,and northwestern China intermontane basins.The sedimentary facies and paleogeography are diversified. In Tibet the basin evolution is largely related to the subduction and collision of the Indian Plate against the Eurasian Continent,and shows a tectonic evolution in the Cretaceous.Foraminifera are a dominant biota in the Tibet Tethys.Nonmarine sediments include variegated and red beds,coal-or salt-bearing horizons,and volcanic rocks.These deposits contain diverse and abundant continental faunas and floras,as well as important coal and off resources.The Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleogeography in China have presented a foundation for geological studies.
樊小龙,余平辉,曾亮,焦学尧,江小青,杨平,马锦龙[5]（2016）在《柴达木盆地新生界生物地层年代研究》文中研究说明柴达木盆地新生代地层广泛分布,富含油气资源。长期以来,各组时代归属存在较大争议。本文以介形类、孢粉和轮藻微体化石为基础,重新探讨了柴达木盆地新生界各组的地质年代归属:路乐河组为古新世—始新世中期;下干柴沟组沉积时代主体为始新世中晚期,渐新世早期也有部分沉积;上干柴沟组为渐新世早期—中新世早期;下油砂山组为中新世早—中期;上油砂山组为中新世中—晚期;狮子沟组为中新世晚期—上新世晚期;七个泉组为更新世早—中期。柴达木盆地新生界各组地质年代的确定对盆地内油气勘探工作具有重要意义。
张文苑,李国彪[6]（2017）在《西藏亚东堆纳地区始新世轮藻化石》文中提出西藏南部地处亚洲板块与印度板块的结合部,在古近纪时曾是新特提斯的残留海盆,因而保存着西藏地区最晚期的海相沉积,本次研究在藏南亚东古鲁浦古近纪地层剖面中首次发现轮藻化石,为探讨新特提斯的消亡过程及印度与亚洲板块陆陆碰撞机制提供了良好的生物地层学资料。鉴定、描述4属4种,其中三新种。该轮藻化石组合总体显示始新世轮藻化石组合的特征,时代应为始新世。轮藻化石在始新世海相地层中的出现,表明该时期研究区处于一种海陆过渡相环境,预示新特提斯残留海盆地的即将消亡。
<Abstract>The Xining and the Minhe Basins bordering on each other around Ledu innorthwestern China cover a wide area from the west of Lanzhou in Gansuprovince to the east of Xining in Qinghai province.In these inland basins,Meso-Cenozoic terrestrial deposits about 6000-7000 meters in thicknessand rich in mineral resources,such as coal,oi1 as well as salts,had beenaccumunated,which yield abundant organic remains comprising microfossils,such as nonmarine ostracods,charophytes,spores and pollen and macrofos-si1s including bivalves.gastropods,esthierians,fishes,reptiles and plants.[7]（1983）在《Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins》文中认为 The Xining and the Minhe Basins bordering on each other around Ledu innorthwestern China cover a wide area from the west of Lanzhou in Gansuprovince to the east of Xining in Qinghai province.In these inland basins,Meso-Cenozoic terrestrial deposits about 6000-7000 meters in thicknessand rich in mineral resources,such as coal,oi1 as well as salts,had beenaccumunated,which yield abundant organic remains comprising microfossils,such as nonmarine ostracods,charophytes,spores and pollen and macrofos-si1s including bivalves.gastropods,esthierians,fishes,reptiles and plants.
杨景林,王启飞,卢辉楠[8]（2008）在《准噶尔盆地白垩纪轮藻化石组合序列》文中研究说明新疆准噶尔盆地的白垩系发育较好,其中含有丰富的轮藻化石,计有20属1亚属63种1亚种3变种2比较种1新型2未定种,其中包括7个新种。根据轮藻植物群的演化,可在盆地的南缘、腹部和东北缘建立4个化石带1个亚带和1个组合:Clypeator zongjiangensis带（南缘、腹部及东北缘）,时代相当于Berriasian-Valanginian;Flabellochara hebeiensis带（南缘）,时代为Barremian;Clypeator jiuquanensis带（腹部）,时代为Hauterivian-Bar-remian,其中包含Atopochara trivolvis triquetra亚带,时代为Barremian;Atopochara restricta带（腹部）,时代为Cenomanian;Aclistochara mundulavar.elliptica-Raskyaechara gobica-Tolypella grambasti组合（腹部、北部及东北缘）,时代应为晚白垩世中、晚期。该组合序列的建立,对确定准噶尔盆地白垩系的年代格架以及与国内外有关地层的对比关系具有十分重要的意义。
张显球,林小燕[9]（2013）在《粤北丹霞盆地白垩系长坝组的介形类动物群》文中提出粤北丹霞盆地白垩系长坝组产介形类化石 15 属 50 种,笔者描述其中 15 属 47 种（包括 3 个新种）。长坝组介形类动物群可以划分两个化石组合:（ 1 ） Mongolocypris-Cypridea-Darwinula 组合,分布长坝组二段,属种繁多, 组合特征明显,与松辽平原泉头组 - 姚家组、湖北贾店组、浙江兰溪组等的介形类面貌相似,可以大致对比,由于出现少量晚白垩世标志化石 Talicypridea 属和大个体的 Mongolocypris 属,反映它与晚白垩世介形类的关系更为密切,但又不同于晚白垩世中晚期的南雄群 Talicypridea 动物群,层位偏低,时代较早,属晚白垩世早期为宜,大致相当于赛诺曼期（ Cenomanian ）;（ 2 ） Cypridea-Altanicypris-Candona 组合,分布长坝组四段,其层位在长坝组二段之上,晚白垩世丹霞组之下,组合中富含类女星介科的 Altanicypris 属,许多属种出现在晚白垩世地层中,其时代属晚白垩世无疑,与土仑期（ Turonian ）大致相当。
庞其清,谷振飞[10]（2011）在《河北泥河湾盆地晚新生代介形类生物地层》文中认为通过河北阳原、蔚县泥河湾盆地晚新生代20余条剖面介形类生物地层的调查研究,发现非常丰富的介形类化石,计23属60余钟,自下而上可明显地划分为5个介形类化石组合带:1.Potamocypris plana-Candoniella-Il-yocypris组合带;2.Leucocythere-Ilyocypris-Candoniella组合带;3.Leucocythere-Cytherissa-Li mnocythere组合带;4.Ilyocypris-Li mnocythere flexa-Li mnocythere dubiosa组合带;5.Li mnocythere dubiosa-Li mnocytheresancti-patricii-Ilyocypris组合带。根据以上5个介形类化石组合带的分布,第1组合带及所含地层红崖村组和石匣组的时代为上新世;第2-4组合带和所含地层泥河湾组的时代为早更新世;第5组合带为中-晚更新世,分布于虎头梁组和许家窑组,虎头梁组置中更新世为宜,许家窑组为晚更新世。
二、Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins（论文开题报告）
（1）论文研究背景及目的
此处内容要求：
首先简单简介论文所研究问题的基本概念和背景，再而简单明了地指出论文所要研究解决的具体问题，并提出你的论文准备的观点或解决方法。
写法范例：
本文主要提出一款精简64位RISC处理器存储管理单元结构并详细分析其设计过程。在该MMU结构中,TLB采用叁个分离的TLB,TLB采用基于内容查找的相联存储器并行查找,支持粗粒度为64KB和细粒度为4KB两种页面大小,采用多级分层页表结构映射地址空间,并详细论述了四级页表转换过程,TLB结构组织等。该MMU结构将作为该处理器存储系统实现的一个重要组成部分。
（2）本文研究方法
调查法：该方法是有目的、有系统的搜集有关研究对象的具体信息。
观察法：用自己的感官和辅助工具直接观察研究对象从而得到有关信息。
实验法：通过主支变革、控制研究对象来发现与确认事物间的因果关系。
文献研究法：通过调查文献来获得资料，从而全面的、正确的了解掌握研究方法。
实证研究法：依据现有的科学理论和实践的需要提出设计。
定性分析法：对研究对象进行“质”的方面的研究，这个方法需要计算的数据较少。
定量分析法：通过具体的数字，使人们对研究对象的认识进一步精确化。
跨学科研究法：运用多学科的理论、方法和成果从整体上对某一课题进行研究。
功能分析法：这是社会科学用来分析社会现象的一种方法，从某一功能出发研究多个方面的影响。
模拟法：通过创设一个与原型相似的模型来间接研究原型某种特性的一种形容方法。
三、Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins（论文提纲范文）
（1）Cretaceous integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China（论文提纲范文）
| 1.Introduction |
| 2.History of Cretaceous stratigraphy in China |
| 3.Integrated stratigraphy |
| 3.1 Marine stratigraphy |
| 3.2 Terrestrial stratigraphy |
| 3.2.1 Terrestrial Lower Cretaceous |
| 3.2.2 Terrestrial Upper Cretaceous |
| 3.2.3 Terrestrial Cretaceous stages and biostratigraphic correlation |
| 3.3 Major stratigraphic boundaries in the Cretaceous |
| 3.3.1 Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary |
| 3.3.2 Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary |
| 3.3.3 Beginning and end of the Cretaceous Normal superchron (CNS, Aptian and Campanian stages) |
| 3.4 Cretaceous biota and major geological events |
| 3.4.1 Jehol Biota |
| 3.4.2 Oceanic anoxic events (OAEs) and Cretaceous oceanic red beds (CORBs) |
| 3.4.3 Other events |
| 4.Stratigraphic Framework for the Cretaceous of China |
| 4.1 Marine and interbedded marine-terrestrial strata |
| 4.1.1 Qinghai-Tibet Plateau |
| 4.1.2 Karakorum and the western Tarim Basin |
| 4.1.3 Eastern Heilongjiang, Taiwan and other regions |
| 4.2 Terrestrial strata |
| 4.2.1 Eastern volcanically active belt |
| 4.2.2 Western to central medium-large stable sedimentary basins |
| 4.3 Comprehensive comparison of Cretaceous strata in China |
| 5.Conclusions, problems and perspectives |
（2）中国非海相白垩纪介形类化石组合（论文提纲范文）
| 1 Introduction |
| 2 Non-marine Cretaceous ostracod assemblages of China |
| 2.1 Jingguella-Minheella-Pinnocypridea assemblage |
| 2.2 Cypridea-Latonia-Darwinula assemblage |
| 2.3 Cypridea (Morinina) -Bisulcocypridea-Mongolocypris assemblage |
| 2.4 Cypridea-Mongolianella-Darwinula assemblage |
| 2.5 Cypridea (Cypridea) -Cypridea (Ulwellia) -Limnocypridea assemblage |
| 2.6 Cypridea-Triangulicypris-Sunliavia-Lycopterocypris assemblage |
| 2.7 Talicypridea-Cypridea-Quadracypris-Candona assemblage |
| 3 Correlation |
| 4 Conclusion |
（5）柴达木盆地新生界生物地层年代研究（论文提纲范文）
| 1 前言 |
| 2地质背景 |
| 2.1 路乐河组 |
| 2.2 下干柴沟组 |
| 2.3 上干柴沟组 |
| 2.4 下油砂山组 |
| 2.5 上油砂山组 |
| 2.6 狮子沟组 |
| 2.7 七个泉组 |
| 3 时代归属讨论 |
| 3.1 路乐河组 |
| 3.2 下干柴沟组 |
| a.下干柴沟组下段 |
| b.下干柴沟组上段 |
| 3.3 上干柴沟组 |
| 3.4 下油砂山组 |
| 3.5 上油砂山组 |
| 3.6 狮子沟组 |
| 3.7 七个泉组 |
| 4 结论 |
（6）西藏亚东堆纳地区始新世轮藻化石（论文提纲范文）
| 引言 |
| 1 地层剖面描述 |
| 2 轮藻化石组合特征及其时代 |
| 3 轮藻化石的古地理意义 |
| 4 化石属种描述 |
| 5 结论 |
（8）准噶尔盆地白垩纪轮藻化石组合序列（论文提纲范文）
| 1 前 言 |
| 2 地层概况及化石分布 |
| 3 轮藻化石组合序列及时代 |
| 3.1 Clypeator zongjiangensis带 |
| 3.2 Flabellochara hebeiensis带 |
| 3.3 Clypeator jiuquanensis带 |
| 3.4 Atopochara trivolvis triquetra亚带 |
| 3.5 Atopochara restricta带 |
| 3.6 Aclistochara mundula var. elliptica-Raskyae-chara gobica-Tolypella grambasti组合 |
| 3.6.1 Lychnothamnus turpanensis-Aclistochara (Caucasuella) xibeiensis-Aclistochara mundula下部亚组合 |
| 3.6.2 Chara communis-Sphaerochara nana-Hornichara prolixa上部亚组合 |
| 4 新种描述 |
| 紫泥泉宽轮藻 (新种) Latochara ziniquanensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 红沙泉开口轮藻 (新种) Aclistochara hongsha-quanensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 西北高加索开口轮藻 (新种) Aclistochara (Caucasuella) xibeiensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 沙丘河高加索开口轮藻 (新种) Aclistochara (Cau-casuella) shaqiuheensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 沙丘河高加索开口轮藻短型 (新种、新型) Aclistochara (Caucasuella) shaqiuheensis f. brevis H. N. Lu sp. et f. nov. |
| 吐鲁番灯枝藻 (新种) Lychnothamnus turpanensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 沙湾中生轮藻 (新种) Mesochara sawanensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
| 西北鸟巢轮藻 (新种) Tolypella xibeiensis H. N. Lu sp. nov. |
四、Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins（论文参考文献）
- [1]Cretaceous integrative stratigraphy and timescale of China[J]. Dangpeng XI,Xiaoqiao WAN,Guobiao LI,Gang LI. Science China（Earth Sciences）, 2019(01)
- [2]中国非海相白垩纪介形类化石组合[J]. 王亚琼,沙金庚,泮燕红,张晓林,饶馨. 地层学杂志, 2012(02)
- [3]Discovery of Fossil Charophytes from the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation and Early Jurassic Lower Yimen Formation, Sichuan Province, and Its Significance[J]. Liu Junying;Chen Zhongliang Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing Panxi Geological Party, Sichuan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Xichang Liu Linqun. Acta Geologica Sinica（English Edition）, 1992(03)
- [4]The Cretaceous System in China[J]. WAN Xiaoqiao~(1,2)CHEN Peiji~3 WEI Mingjian~1 1 Capital Normal University,105 Xishanhuan Beilu,Beijing 100037 2 China University of Geosciences,29 Xueyuan Road,Beijing 100083 3 Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing,Jiangsu 210008. Acta Geologica Sinica（English Edition）, 2007(06)
- [5]柴达木盆地新生界生物地层年代研究[J]. 樊小龙,余平辉,曾亮,焦学尧,江小青,杨平,马锦龙. 微体古生物学报, 2016(04)
- [6]西藏亚东堆纳地区始新世轮藻化石[J]. 张文苑,李国彪. 微体古生物学报, 2017(04)
- [7]Middle Jurassic—Tertiary Deposits and Ostracod—Charophyte fossil assemblages of Xining and Minhe Basins[J]. <Abstract>The Xining and the Minhe Basins bordering on each other around Ledu innorthwestern China cover a wide area from the west of Lanzhou in Gansuprovince to the east of Xining in Qinghai province.In these inland basins,Meso-Cenozoic terrestrial deposits about 6000-7000 meters in thicknessand rich in mineral resources,such as coal,oi1 as well as salts,had beenaccumunated,which yield abundant organic remains comprising microfossils,such as nonmarine ostracods,charophytes,spores and pollen and macrofos-si1s including bivalves.gastropods,esthierians,fishes,reptiles and plants.. 地球科学, 1983(S1)
- [8]准噶尔盆地白垩纪轮藻化石组合序列[J]. 杨景林,王启飞,卢辉楠. 微体古生物学报, 2008(04)
- [9]粤北丹霞盆地白垩系长坝组的介形类动物群[J]. 张显球,林小燕. 微体古生物学报, 2013(01)
- [10]河北泥河湾盆地晚新生代介形类生物地层[J]. 庞其清,谷振飞. 微体古生物学报, 2011(01)